Came into a gameday thread before the game with a post and likes. You know what you have to do for the next game.
I asked this earlier and didn't see a response. When Lindell got hit in the face on the three, there was a flagrant 1 called. Why weren't there five free throws? 3 for the 3, 2 for the flagrant 1.
Last year was a bit more of a constant improvement but no one can say they started the season playing close to where they should have. To Prohms credit they finished above where they probably should have.
The issue is most teams have ups and downs. Generally they can be explained. Particularly with this team there is no explanation for it. For example Freds teams struggled in low energy situations. That’s something they worked on and never really got over but you can make sense of it and work to improve on it. There is no reasoning for the ups and downs this year. I’m sure the team can identify the issue but as outside spectators we can’t see the why and therefore see effort to fix it.
How do you explain OU, two years ago...the 17 pt first half, Cousins running his mouth & the floor slapping, then the Clones win the game. Plenty of opportunities for the fans to give up...yet they were loud that entire second half.An X-factor in this game, compared to the Tennessee debacle: Crowd engagement. And that's not a knock on the fans (at least not directly).
Against UT, even when ISU had a lead early, baskets were infrequent, so it didn't charge-up the fans with any consistency. Then Tennessee got up double-digits, ISU couldn't buy a basket, never established any momentum, crowd was taken out of the mix. In turn, the players couldn't feed off of the fans. So they weren't playing too well, plus there was nothing to fuel more energy, and despondency set in. Downward spiral. Hilton impact was never a factor.
Versus WVU, Iowa State got an early lead, seemingly couldn't miss from the field, and even after West Virginia rallied to get back into the game, they responded with a run and got fans' juices flowing again.
How do you explain OU, two years ago...the 17 pt first half, Cousins running his mouth & the floor slapping, then the Clones win the game. Plenty of opportunities for the fans to give up...yet they were loud that entire second half.
You know, before arriving to ISU, I thought DJ was going to be more of a PG type and that's clearly not his forte, especially in half-court sets. We all want him to be spotting up to be the deadly shooter that he is. However, he does push the tempo very well and I think he's good at finding the open guy in transition. We needed those assists tonight without NWB in the line-up.Donovan dropped 25 and had 7 assists, arguably the best game he's played as a Cyclone.
I think you’re right maybe on the why. I just don’t feel that is an acceptable way to coach at least to the extent it happens. Playing to March is a real thing but in multi bid conferences you can’t do it in spite of the regular season. For years like this year where coming in with the talent there was a real possibility of a bubble shot it is super important to value the regular season as that may be what gets you into the tournament.There are two issues for the inconsistency. The first is that this team is young and reliant upon a couple of 19 years and typically they will be inconsistent and let their offense dictate their effort in other areas.
The second which I think we have to accept as a likely constant is that CSP doesn't value the regular season to the extent that many of the fans (including me) would like him to. But I think there is a good reason for that. As a head coach and asst coach at Murray State your season is defined oftentimes by a single week at your conference tournament. Non-conference wins and losses do not matter and neither do regular season titles. All that matters is how you are playing the first week in March.
Hence, he is completely willing to sacrifice a game in November, December or January if he feels a lesson needs to be learned. It has worked for him at Murray State and that strategy worked well last year.
I'm not sure if Larry E., Tim Floyd or Bill Self would approach it the same way as those coaches put so much emphasis on regular season conference titles. I don't think there is a right or wrong approach but I do think it explains the clunkers and why they aren't always in "predictable low-energy" spots.
I think you’re right maybe on the why. I just don’t feel that is an acceptable way to coach at least to the extent it happens. Playing to March is a real thing but in multi bid conferences you can’t do it in spite of the regular season. For years like this year where coming in with the talent there was a real possibility of a bubble shot it is super important to value the regular season as that may be what gets you into the tournament.
I've felt that way about Prohm since the beginning. As a fan I want to win every game, not watch the head coach try to figure out who is going to be the best rotation in March.There are two issues for the inconsistency. The first is that this team is young and reliant upon a couple of 19 years and typically they will be inconsistent and let their offense dictate their effort in other areas.
The second which I think we have to accept as a likely constant is that CSP doesn't value the regular season to the extent that many of the fans (including me) would like him to. But I think there is a good reason for that. As a head coach and asst coach at Murray State your season is defined oftentimes by a single week at your conference tournament. Non-conference wins and losses do not matter and neither do regular season titles. All that matters is how you are playing the first week in March.
Hence, he is completely willing to sacrifice a game in November, December or January if he feels a lesson needs to be learned. It has worked for him at Murray State and that strategy worked well last year.
I'm not sure if Larry E., Tim Floyd or Bill Self would approach it the same way as those coaches put so much emphasis on regular season conference titles. I don't think there is a right or wrong approach but I do think it explains the clunkers and why they aren't always in "predictable low-energy" spots.
Sorry but this makes no sense. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that Prohm puts little emphasis on conference wins; he only wants to win the B12 t'ment. But everyone wants to dance, and no one more than Steve. And to get to the dance, and get a decent seed, you need to do well in the conference. So, I am afraid that while you may be correct, it does not make sense to me.There are two issues for the inconsistency. The first is that this team is young and reliant upon a couple of 19 years and typically they will be inconsistent and let their offense dictate their effort in other areas.
The second which I think we have to accept as a likely constant is that CSP doesn't value the regular season to the extent that many of the fans (including me) would like him to. But I think there is a good reason for that. As a head coach and asst coach at Murray State your season is defined oftentimes by a single week at your conference tournament. Non-conference wins and losses do not matter and neither do regular season titles. All that matters is how you are playing the first week in March.
Hence, he is completely willing to sacrifice a game in November, December or January if he feels a lesson needs to be learned. It has worked for him at Murray State and that strategy worked well last year.
I'm not sure if Larry E., Tim Floyd or Bill Self would approach it the same way as those coaches put so much emphasis on regular season conference titles. I don't think there is a right or wrong approach but I do think it explains the clunkers and why they aren't always in "predictable low-energy" spots.