*** Official Space Flight Discussion (Non-political Only) ***

wxman1

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 2, 2008
19,864
16,211
113
Cedar Rapids
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,825
13,880
113
So….who's holding the bag for all of these failures? Is this SpaceX shareholders, or do we pay for each test flight?
My understanding (could be wrong, someone correct me if so) is that SpaceX pays for their R&D. Its not specifically paid for by the USG on a dedicated R&D contract.

That said, SpaceX gets a chunk of their revenue from USG contracts to put sats in space, ferry flights to ISS etc. But its not directly linked. And most of SpaceX rev now comes from Starlink subscriptions.

It's just R&D. No different than Merck spending on a drug that eventually doesn't help. A Starship explosion is probably cheaper than the drug failure. Just with more exploding.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,751
62,248
113
54
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
So….who's holding the bag for all of these failures? Is this SpaceX shareholders, or do we pay for each test flight?
Probably depends on who/what the launch is for and how the contract was written.

I think you're going to have more failures the more you push the technology, and one of NASA's downfalls was becoming risk averse in a field where that really limits what you can potentially accomplish.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: dafarmer

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,825
13,880
113

JP4CY

Lord, beer me strength.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
74,167
94,896
113
Testifying
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny

besserheimerphat

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
11,416
15,164
113
Mount Vernon, WA
Probably depends on who/what the launch is for and how the contract was written.

I think you're going to have more failures the more you push the technology, and one of NASA's downfalls was becoming risk averse in a field where that really limits what you can potentially accomplish.
That's part of it - higher tech requires expanding the envelope, which is messy. It gets complicated when the agency is funded by tax dollars, and people want to see a return on their investment. That will drive towards more conservatism (which actually INCREASES costs).

I don't mind SpaceX blowing up rockets because it's beneficial for learning. I just wish it weren't so disastrous for the environment and disruptive to the locals. There are better ways than just building bigger fireworks...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

Letterkenny

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 26, 2023
1,705
3,499
113
That's part of it - higher tech requires expanding the envelope, which is messy. It gets complicated when the agency is funded by tax dollars, and people want to see a return on their investment. That will drive towards more conservatism (which actually INCREASES costs).

I don't mind SpaceX blowing up rockets because it's beneficial for learning. I just wish it weren't so disastrous for the environment and disruptive to the locals. There are better ways than just building bigger fireworks...
Disruption to the locals I understand. That's definitely an issue. I don't agree that it's "disastrous for the environment". Bear in mind, every rocket ever built either lands in the ocean, or blows up on land, other than the space shuttle (booster still went into the ocean) and the falcon 9 boosters. I'd argue that if (and that's a big IF) Starship is successful, it'll be more environmentally friendly long term due to not throwing rocket parts into the ocean every flight.
 
  • Winner
  • Disagree
Reactions: BACyclone and Turn2

Turn2

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2011
21,988
26,228
113
Clusterfunkeny
Disruption to the locals I understand. That's definitely an issue. I don't agree that it's "disastrous for the environment". Bear in mind, every rocket ever built either lands in the ocean, or blows up on land, other than the space shuttle (booster still went into the ocean) and the falcon 9 boosters. I'd argue that if (and that's a big IF) Starship is successful, it'll be more environmentally friendly long term due to not throwing rocket parts into the ocean every flight.

 
  • Like
Reactions: wxman1