We need more Clayton Vette.
Along with Marcus Brister, Antwon Oliver and LA Pomlee.
We need more Clayton Vette.
Thread is tl;dr for just jumping in now, but kind of surprised there was no "Paul Janssen is a joke" thread when I logged in. I'm not one to complain about refs much, but neither is Brent Blum (via Twitter):
"Equally bad" maybe, I wouldn't assign any bias, but really it was just plain bad. Almost unwatchable, though MCC had something to do with that too. (Squeezing 16:9 content fullscreen on a 4:3 channel instead of letterboxing? Thank goodness my DVR has a stretch function.) Out of the Cyclones, feel particularly bad for Niang. How is this guy and his compadres still reffing?
BTW, just to add fuel to fire (if it hasn't been mentioned yet), Iowa was in charge of hiring officials... *runs*
It's just like last year, with losses that aren't NEARLY as bad last year's.
This is key and it's a big reason why I don't understand the complete doubters right now. We've lost three non-cons this season. We lost three last season.
Last year, we lost to Michigan on the road, Drake on the road, and UNI at home. Drake and UNI were absolutely bad losses.
This year, we lost to Cincinnati on a neutral floor, UNLV on their court, and Iowa on the road. Not a bad loss in the bunch. Cincinnati is undefeated and ranked #11. UNLV has just one loss and is #20. Iowa is a damn good basketball team this year that played with passion in a rivalry game and took advantage of their home court and our lack of focus to get a win.
The sky is not falling, people! There are WAY too many people talking about how bad this team is. They is certainly room for improvement, but pump the brakes a little bit.
I agree, we're not out of it yet, but so far the B12 has been abysmal. We will probably have to win 12 conference games just to get a sniff at the tourney, IMO. The conference will be lucky to get 4 in this year. I think we can be in the top 4, but we're going to have to play much more consistently.
There won't be a 1st round draft pick riding to the rescue this year.
I agree, but think about this: The same team that had two bad non-con losses last season went 12-6 in a Big 12 that looks like it will end up being significantly stronger than the one this year's team will play in.
With the conference being abysmal, this ISU team can afford to play inconsistently on occasion and still win games.
This is key and it's a big reason why I don't understand the complete doubters right now. We've lost three non-cons this season. We lost three last season.
Last year, we lost to Michigan on the road, Drake on the road, and UNI at home. Drake and UNI were absolutely bad losses.
This year, we lost to Cincinnati on a neutral floor, UNLV on their court, and Iowa on the road. Not a bad loss in the bunch. Cincinnati is undefeated and ranked #11. UNLV has just one loss and is #20. Iowa is a damn good basketball team this year that played with passion in a rivalry game and took advantage of their home court and our lack of focus to get a win.
The sky is not falling, people! There are WAY too many people talking about how bad this team is. They is certainly room for improvement, but pump the brakes a little bit.
I hate the expression "it is what it is," but I can't think of a better way to describe this year's non-con thus far. If watching/comprehending college bball for 20+ years has taught me anything, it's not to overreact to a handful of non-con losses.This is key and it's a big reason why I don't understand the complete doubters right now. We've lost three non-cons this season. We lost three last season.
Last year, we lost to Michigan on the road, Drake on the road, and UNI at home. Drake and UNI were absolutely bad losses.
This year, we lost to Cincinnati on a neutral floor, UNLV on their court, and Iowa on the road. Not a bad loss in the bunch. Cincinnati is undefeated and ranked #11. UNLV has just one loss and is #20. Iowa is a damn good basketball team this year that played with passion in a rivalry game and took advantage of their home court and our lack of focus to get a win.
The sky is not falling, people! There are WAY too many people talking about how bad this team is. They is certainly room for improvement, but pump the brakes a little bit.
Something that mighjt be mentioned: Scotty, Royce and Chris are probably more potent than Georges, KL, and Will at this point. The other players are the same from last year.I agree, but think about this: The same team that had two bad non-con losses last season went 12-6 in a Big 12 that looks like it will end up being significantly stronger than the one this year's team will play in.
With the conference being abysmal, this ISU team can afford to play inconsistently on occasion and still win games.
Babb.Yes and maybe no. Can this year's team do this? Last year with White in control, obviously. This year I feel there is yet an individual to take over. It can happen, but who is it gonna be.
I agree, we're not out of it yet, but so far the B12 has been abysmal. We will probably have to win 12 conference games just to get a sniff at the tourney, IMO. The conference will be lucky to get 4 in this year. I think we can be in the top 4, but we're going to have to play much more consistently.
I disagree. I almost guarantee 11-7 gets us in. 10-8 and we're 50/50. There just aren't that many good teams around to choose over a 10-8 Big 12 team. The Pac 12 is still weak, the SEC sucks, the ACC is struggling...