Since the Duke Lacrosse Rape Hoax has already been invoked earlier in the thread, here is the reason why I consider my response to this incident to be more reasonable than the response of those who supported that lying murdering slut Crystal Mangum:
This report is based on grand jury indictments of two Penn State administrators after a three year investigation, and pending charges of child molestation from at least eight young men against Coach Sandusky.
The Duke Lacrosse case was an allegation from a single mentally unstable young woman that collapsed before it was presented to a Grand Jury.
To say that the two situations are equal is saying that the State of Pennsylvania knowingly provided perjured testimony to the grand jury, and pressured Penn State to retaliate against any of the kids making allegations. Those are pretty serious allegations, if you ask me.
Now tell me again: Who's jumping to conclusions here?
This report is based on grand jury indictments of two Penn State administrators after a three year investigation, and pending charges of child molestation from at least eight young men against Coach Sandusky.
The Duke Lacrosse case was an allegation from a single mentally unstable young woman that collapsed before it was presented to a Grand Jury.
To say that the two situations are equal is saying that the State of Pennsylvania knowingly provided perjured testimony to the grand jury, and pressured Penn State to retaliate against any of the kids making allegations. Those are pretty serious allegations, if you ask me.
Now tell me again: Who's jumping to conclusions here?