Huggins might be in trouble, DUI is good, Bees are bad

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,387
28,666
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
Yeah I don't really care if they use it but I think that word only causes more negativity even when in proper context, so IMO it's better if it just dies.
But that's not happening, and white people kinda just need to get over it. Saying the N word is like literally the only thing we're societally barred from.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
29,971
27,659
113
Dez Moy Nez
But that's not happening, and white people kinda just need to get over it. Saying the N word is like literally the only thing we're societally barred from.
I just think if you really want things to heal, thumbing people in the eye isn't the best way to get there, but those whiteys that are going to get all pissy aren't going to change anyways.
 

4theCYcle

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2013
2,347
1,249
113
Urbandale, IA
64, from Chicago, lived in L.A., S.F., Minnesota, and now WV. Have two very good friends who are openly gay who just rolled their eyes at people making such a big deal about this. Was it appropriate? No. But, even they can wrap the proper context around it. I wonder what half this crowd would think if they ever went to an open mic comedy in S.F. If it was an every day thing, then I'd join you lynch mob people. But, c'mon.
Good point. I mean, how often do we see where more people who aren't gay actually become more offended than the individuals who this type of behavior would affect/offend more. I'm not saying that the offender should just be let off the hook and let this slide and it makes it ok, but oftentimes people look for reactions and create more drama when it may not have needed to be. Not necessarily in this situation, but even other topics this happens a lot. Sometimes people look for causes to fight or ways to be offended.

I've even had a friend who was gay awhile back would complain about in his terms/words - there are gay people and then there are flamboyant flamers who seek and look for attention. That would annoy him. I'm like oh...did not expect you to say that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cloneon

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
29,971
27,659
113
Dez Moy Nez
Good point. I mean, how often do we see where more people who aren't gay actually become more offended than the individuals who this type of behavior would affect/offend more. I'm not saying that the offender should just be let off the hook and let this slide and it makes it ok, but oftentimes people look for reactions and create more drama when it may not have needed to be. Not necessarily in this situation, but even other topics this happens a lot. Sometimes people look for causes to fight or ways to be offended.

I've even had a friend who was gay awhile back would complain about in his terms/words - there are gay people and then there are flamboyant flamers who seek and look for attention. That would annoy him. I'm like oh...did not expect you to say that.
That is more common than you think. Many gay men aren't flamboyant at all.
 

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
35,247
31,373
113
Honestly not sure how reactions would be but I asked a bunch of my friends what their thoughts were. Didn't give any indication that he apologized or if he's in trouble...just shared the audio and asked for thoughts.

Common reaction was along the lines of 'Not good. will he get in trouble? guessing not.'

Several 'it's really bad but who is shocked by this in sports'

One 'who the **** is Bob Huggins?'

The smiley is for your very last line. Not making light of your other responses.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dahliaclone

4theCYcle

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2013
2,347
1,249
113
Urbandale, IA
People blowing this off because "it was a normal thing to say when I was in high school" are honestly disgusting.

You all were clearly not on the receiving end of those hateful words. The 3 letter variant and the -got version have the same meaning.

The intended meanings have been to call a male too weak or too feminine. It is also used as an outright homophobic slur.

And yes, hundreds of years ago, it meant a bundle of sticks. I think we all know that's not what it has realistically meant for many, many years.

Stop normalizing hate speech.
I don't think people are normalizing hate speech here. I think people are openly discussing what they encountered in high school and what it was like versus now because this is a message board and a topic to discuss. Are people not supposed to talk about it? Times have changed yes, which is a good thing and I used to be one to use it occasionally in a term of "that's stupid" back in the day. However, I don't even use the word in that context anymore or at all because people do mature and realize that it isn't needed. This obviously opens up to bullying which is rampant in schools. I got along with a lot of people of different ages when I was in HS (small SE IA school) and I was made fun of quite often. The 3/6 letter word got tossed around too often at my school and I did happen to be on the receiving end of that. I know there's banter and poking fun between friends, but even when people would say stop, it didn't. I knew what it was like to be bullied, so I always tried to be nice to everyone else.

It isn't pretty what Huggy said. I hope Huggy learns from it, but I have my doubts. We likely will never truly know. We live in a world where people do suck. They have no remorse for spewing hate and how they treat others. Does there need to be some type of consequence for his actions, absolutely. Otherwise, how do we learn from our mistakes? So, while I do not know the best course for his actions, maybe a class or two on counseling, some open discussions on their radio show, some donations to a good cause. I think there is a case for him to be fired, but I don't think that'll likely happen.
That is more common than you think. Many gay men aren't flamboyant at all.
No lol, I know that it is more common and that not every gay guy is flamboyant. I meant I was just surprised at his comment about it as I didn't expect him to really think that. It's more about almost him in a way not being as accepting, if that makes sense.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
29,971
27,659
113
Dez Moy Nez
Not anymore? :D
Idk if it's the same guy anymore, or girl for that matter. I don't pay that close attention. I just remember reading an article about it few years back. Tall red head if I remember right.
 

swiacy

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
2,200
1,999
113
I think about it every so often. The worst part was that I found him and I live with that memory almost everyday. I'm the only one that knows where it happened at and that's something I won't share, not even with my siblings. It made a friend of ours cry the other night as we were out for Cinco De Mayo and she brought up what age you would like to relive again to our group. It came around to me and I gave here the reason why and she felt so bad.

Never had time to digest everything as I was thrust into taking over the farm overnight, I wasn't ready to jump in at 17 years old to do this kind a thing. My mom probably said it best, "I don't want you to feel obligated to take over, I want you to live your life for you." I went to ISU that fall and here I am today some 40 years later.
You are a strong person to carry on thru that, the support you received at 17 and the self motivation was exceptional to go forward. Events like that put things in perspective and I hope you have found peace.
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,321
4,370
113
Arlington, TX
It's absolutely a game for a large chunk of the black population, knowing that they can use it without repercussion and white people are liable to get assaulted for using it.

But all things considered, I don't understand why some white people can't just let them have it. Is it unfair that they can say it and we can't? Sure. You know what else is (unfathomably more) unfair? Getting shot by the police for no reason. Jim Crow laws. Slavery. Just let 'em have this one.
It seems foolish for any society to have/promote words that are hunky-dory for one ethnicity to use, but derogatory/taboo for all other ethnicities to use. The whole point of that arrangement is to create and promote societal strife, confusion, division, and conflict.
 

CloniesForLife

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2015
15,580
21,001
113
It seems foolish for any society to have/promote words that are hunky-dory for one ethnicity to use, but derogatory/taboo for all other ethnicities to use. The whole point of that arrangement is to create and promote societal strife, confusion, division, and conflict.
Yeah black people taking an extremely derogatory term back and using it causes so much societal strife... Of all the things that have happened/do happen in this country this is very low on the list of what is causing strife, confusion, division and conflict. I don't understand why white people not being able to use a word like that while black people can is causing anyone even a second of consternation. And I'm going to leave it at that since this isn't the cave.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,387
28,666
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
It seems foolish for any society to have/promote words that are hunky-dory for one ethnicity to use, but derogatory/taboo for all other ethnicities to use. The whole point of that arrangement is to create and promote societal strife, confusion, division, and conflict.

It is foolish, but it's so ******* minor that I can't begin to bring myself to care.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lineup

SimpsonClone

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2014
753
647
93
33
Please tell me what the nuance is.
Exactly what I explained in the post you replied to. Nuance in a discussion like this is understanding that when someone says "XXX was an acceptable term not that long ago" they aren't giving their seal of approval for the use of that term at that place and time. They are pretty obviously implying that the term was normalized and generally accepted by a large part of society. Shoot, they even said in their post that it wasn't okay but it was a normal part of language not that long ago.

If @Al_4_State used that term back in the 90s/00s then I would venture to guess that much like myself, they are ashamed of that behavior and by no means intend to diminish how distasteful and not okay it was for people like ourselves to use it. Their point is that society accepted, and normalized such hate speech so it isn't terribly surprising that someone like Bob Huggins still uses that language today despite how distasteful and wrong it is.

My point is, go after those who think that using that word isn't a big deal. But for the love of everything good in this world, progressively minded folks need to stop forming circular firing squads.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Al_4_State

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,456
25,848
113
Exactly what I explained in the post you replied to. Nuance in a discussion like this is understanding that when someone says "XXX was an acceptable term not that long ago" they aren't giving their seal of approval for the use of that term at that place and time. They are pretty obviously implying that the term was normalized and generally accepted by a large part of society. Shoot, they even said in their post that it wasn't okay but it was a normal part of language not that long ago.

If @Al_4_State used that term back in the 90s/00s then I would venture to guess that much like myself, they are ashamed of that behavior and by no means intend to diminish how distasteful and not okay it was for people like ourselves to use it. Their point is that society accepted, and normalized such hate speech so it isn't terribly surprising that someone like Bob Huggins still uses that language today despite how distasteful and wrong it is.

My point is, go after those who think that using that word isn't a big deal. But for the love of everything good in this world, progressively minded folks need to stop forming circular firing squads.

As to the bolded, where then do you put Bob Huggins in this? I think you have to realize it's not as black and white as people who use the word in a hateful/derogatory manner vs. people who make an honest mistake. To me, there remains culpability for someone who maybe isn't using it in an inflammatory way, but should also absolutely, unequivocally know better.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron