Actually, this was all just a clever ploy by OJ to get inside, where the killer has obviously been hiding from him all of these years. He'll track him down now.
Didn't you ever see Monk?
Historic Cases: OJ - Did he do it?
- Thread starter ISUFan22
- Start date
Didn't you ever see Monk?
Yeah, he was pretty sure he would find the real killers on all those golf courses in Florida.
IMO, he did it.......no other suspect was ever turned up by the police at the time or since. It was just a matter of money buying very good lawyers, and a DA office that did not do a very good job with the case.
At least he was found to be responsible in the civil case.
Compare and contrast that with people who forgive the killer and go visit their child's murderer in prison.
Not saying he needs to do that, but if the sole purpose of your life is making another man's life miserable for revenge, thats a pretty sad existance, and not one I'd personally be all that proud of...
Also goes along with what someone else pointed out 2 wrongs don't make a right.
I can honestly say you are the first I've ever heard say that OJ didn't do it.
Without a doubt, he killed those two.
Even as stupid as the citizens are in LA, I can't believe they were able to find 12 dopes who would cast their vote to acquit him, even with as badly as the prosecution screwed up. Think about that. 12 people voted to acquit. Not one of them held out to hang the jury. Not one.
Even as stupid as the citizens are in LA, I can't believe they were able to find 12 dopes who would cast their vote to acquit him, even with as badly as the prosecution screwed up. Think about that. 12 people voted to acquit. Not one of them held out to hang the jury. Not one.
The one thing writing "If I did it..." proves is that he was not an English major.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8ZrlO0C4B4]YouTube - Dave chappelle black trial[/ame]
"what black man don't have a bloody glove? i got a bloody glove right here, don't mean i did anything!"
"what black man don't have a bloody glove? i got a bloody glove right here, don't mean i did anything!"
The DNA of the blood at the crime scene alone makes it pretty impossible to honestly think he's innocent. What were the odds that it was someone else's - 1 in 170 million for the glove, and 1 in 10 billion on some piece of Nicole Brown Simpson's clothing? And they found blood from her, Goldman, and O.J. in his Bronco? I don't care if you want to give him the benefit of the doubt - it's ridiculous to doubt that kind of evidence. The only reason it didn't convince the jury was that it was too new at the time (and he was O.J. Simpson).
IMO this was not anything close to a "jury of his peers". That would have meant having other millionaire athletes or at least his millionarie neighbors in Brentwood on the jury.
The whole thing was a joke - the judge should have been disbarred for his lack of control and stupid rulings. Having it on TV made it even a bigger joke... I think today they handle TV in court better than they did then, that may have even been the first one on TV.
As a native of California, I must remind you that California people are like a box of GRANOLA cereal....Some are NUTS, others are FRUITS, and the rest are FLAKES......Thats why OJ got off..... Every time I visit there, it reminds why it is not a place to live.....:notworthy:
