So basically just like Urban, Fisher and Gus, Ferentz has done such a great job coaching that he has demanded a really nice contract.
Sounds about right.
Once again, how is KF different than the rest?
So basically just like Urban, Fisher and Gus, Ferentz has done such a great job coaching that he has demanded a really nice contract.
Sounds about right.
Don't forget Fran M! I kid. I kid. I kid.So basically just like Urban, Fisher and Gus, Ferentz has done such a great job coaching that he has demanded a really nice contract.
Sounds about right.
Once again, how is KF different than the rest?
FIFYEven with Lovie and Kirk on it, that is a mostly strong list of coaches there!
Once again, how is KF different than the rest?
I think he's trying to point out how Urban, Jimbo and Gus (hilarious name group btw) have won National Titles and can justifiably ask for a big contract but Ferentz is overpaid just "because."I am looking at the similarities.
I'm not sure how it is a negative to be on this list? Can you explain that to me?
You do realize that @CyTwins 's post is incorrect, don't you?I'm no fan of CyTwins usual trolling just like I abhor much of the trolling our resident hawks put on here. However, CyTwins didn't write this piece and his posting it here doesn't deserve the derision he is getting. How about talking about the merits of the points made in the article?
ISU fans would be thrilled if they had KF and had similar results the last 18 years with the same compensation.
I am looking at the similarities.
I'm not sure how it is a negative to be on this list? Can you explain that to me?
The ones you listed, (you didn't put lovie there) all have been highly associated with a Natty, except your boy and he has a similar contract. Although I question if 6 or 7 or 8 wins gets a bonus for them. Campbell doesn't even have that.
Try talking about that then. Yes, he should have stated one of the five worst, however that doesn't mean that Kirk's isn't the worst, just that they didn't rate the worst five 1 through 5. They just lumped them together.You do realize that @CyTwins 's post is incorrect, don't you?
Kirk is someone you can most likely trust your kid with, who obviously has put guys in the NFL. For the most part, he's a steady presence on the sidelines.Ferentz has earned a contract that is being compared to National title winning coaches, I already knew that. Once again tell me how this is a bad thing?
Probably about as much as Campbell or any other Power 5 coach does.You think Ferentz ever stays awake at night thinking about how he's gotten rich off of college kids?
It's bad because you're paying for something you'll never achieve. They are paying for something they could.Ferentz has earned a contract that is being compared to National title winning coaches, I already knew that. Once again tell me how this is a bad thing?
Kirk is someone you can most likely trust your kid with, who obviously has put guys in the NFL. For the most part, he's a steady presence on the sidelines.
But the main point with a lot of these articles is that it sounds like you're overpaying for an average of 7.5 wins a year over his career. None of that has anything to do with ISU or ISU fans taking that result or not.
It's just a fact.