Bevins has a frame at 6'5" which gives him a frame and length that we have lacked at DE. Ferentz' attempt to get him to switch his commit, is telling. KF's success over the years has been building his raw offensive and defensive line recruits into NFL level talent. His number of NFL linemen on current NFL rosters speaks to this. Rhoads was on him early and Bevins has a lot of potential.I'm very happy with the DL recruiting the past two years. 2-3 years from now, I'd love to see a starting DL made up of Irving, Aka, Pompey, and Cousin. It could be monstrous. and that's not even mentioning the other guys.
Bevins has a frame at 6'5" which gives him a frame and length that we have lacked at DE. Ferentz' attempt to get him to switch his commit, is telling. KF's success over the years has been building his raw offensive and defensive line recruits into NFL level talent. His number of NFL linemen on current NFL rosters speaks to this. Rhoads was on him early and Bevins has a lot of potential.
Really? You haven't heard of a guy named Irving???Bevins has a frame at 6'5" which gives him a frame and length that we have lacked at DE. Ferentz' attempt to get him to switch his commit, is telling. KF's success over the years has been building his raw offensive and defensive line recruits into NFL level talent. His number of NFL linemen on current NFL rosters speaks to this. Rhoads was on him early and Bevins has a lot of potential.
I was going to say, you may not even be naming the best four--especially if you consider that CPR compared Bevins to Jordan Carstens suggested to me that he may well end up the guy inside next to Pompey. :biggrin:I'm very happy with the DL recruiting the past two years. 2-3 years from now, I'd love to see a starting DL made up of Irving, Aka, Pompey, and Cousin. It could be monstrous. and that's not even mentioning the other guys.
Ian, not a bad piece, but perhaps you should have reached out more, researched, instead of beginning with a simplistic, preconceived notion, and attempting to fit your facts to it. For example, it's not Mitch Meyers "bulk" that most thrills the Cyclone coaches, but his phenomenal athleticism. With a vertical jump in the mid-thirties, and a 40 in the low 4.6's, it is his sheer athleticism that they are looking forward to putting out there. That is just one example. Still, thanks very much!
Really? You haven't heard of a guy named Irving???
I was going to say, you may not even be naming the best four--especially if you consider that CPR compared Bevins to Jordan Carstens suggested to me that he may well end up the guy inside next to Pompey. :biggrin:
Ian, not a bad piece, but perhaps you should have reached out more, researched, instead of beginning with a simplistic, preconceived notion, and attempting to fit your facts to it. For example, it's not Mitch Meyers "bulk" that most thrills the Cyclone coaches, but his phenomenal athleticism. With a vertical jump in the mid-thirties, and a 40 in the low 4.6's, it is his sheer athleticism that they are looking forward to putting out there. That is just one example. Still, thanks very much!
Oh, btw--I have to think that it's kind of funny, all of the attention given to wrestlers in this class, and how great of football players they make. After all...David Irving was a basketball player.
Signed, a former hoopster. :wink:
Really? You haven't heard of a guy named Irving???
Oh, btw--I have to think that it's kind of funny, all of the attention given to wrestlers in this class, and how great of football players they make. After all...David Irving was a basketball player.
Signed, a former hoopster. :wink:
I don't understand. Honestly.What's Macaulay Culkin like in person?
Didn't mean to imply that it wasn't a legitimate point, just, as a former basketball player who had a constant running friendly battle with wrestlers (which included my best friend, the team heavyweight), I had to defend "our" honor. Basketball players can make just as good football players as wrestlers do. :wink:The reason the attention is being paid to the wrestlers is simple. It's an individual sport and THREE members of the class are currently top-ranked in their perspective classes.
Haven't look, but I find it hard to believe that another recruiting class in America mimics that. It's a pretty unique deal. I'm the one who asked the question that led to Rhoads' quote on the wrestlers last Wednesday. I knew the background of his son's wrestling and coach gave the exact type of quote I was looking for.
I'd honestly guess that we haven't had a guy with anything close to his size and sheer athleticism on defense since since Matt Blair. That's been a while!And on David Irving, you are correct. But how often does ISU sign a guy of size on the defensive line? Not very.
Didn't say that I didn't. Matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I said "thanks"! On the other hand, there is a difference between enjoying it, and recognizing that the slightest bit more effort could have made a substantial difference. After all, since this is online media, I kinda doubt that you put a limit on the number of words, as a print editor would have.I enjoyed Ian's piece.
I don't understand. Honestly.
Edit. Oh, I see. Sorry, I'm a little tired tonight.
Well, Janny, I know that me and the rest of the CF'ers must seem like "intellectuals" to you--but we like ya anyway! :yes:
Didn't mean to imply that it wasn't a legitimate point, just, as a former basketball player who had a constant running friendly battle with wrestlers (which included my best friend, the team heavyweight), I had to defend "our" honor. Basketball players can make just as good football players as wrestlers do. :wink:
By the way, I was looking at the state rankings last week. Why is it that while lots of people talk about Bevins finishing second last year, and Seeley finishing first at heavyweight, no one ever never mentions that it must have been Seeley who beat Bevins in the final--since the two schools are in the same class?
I'd honestly guess that we haven't had a guy with anything close to his size and sheer athleticism on defense since since Matt Blair. That's been a while!
Didn't say that I didn't. Matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I said "thanks"! On the other hand, there is a difference between enjoying it, and recognizing that the slightest bit more effort could have made a substantial difference. After all, since this is online media, I kinda doubt that you put a limit on the number of words, as a print editor would have.
CW, perhaps I am mistaken, but it sounds like you're being a bit touchy. One reason I enjoy CF so much is the indepth analysis, the real meat, not the shallow "fluff" pieces that the print media nowadays is so accustomed to. Please pardon me if I have come not only to appreciate, but to expect a little bit higher level of performance from you and your guys.
Don't mean to sound like I'm on some high horse or something, so I'll wander along now...
Didn't mean to imply that it wasn't a legitimate point, just, as a former basketball player who had a constant running friendly battle with wrestlers (which included my best friend, the team heavyweight), I had to defend "our" honor. Basketball players can make just as good football players as wrestlers do. :wink:
I don't understand. Honestly.
Edit. Oh, I see. Sorry, I'm a little tired tonight.
Well, Janny, I know that me and the rest of the CF'ers must seem like "intellectuals" to you--but we like ya anyway! :yes:
Didn't mean to imply that it wasn't a legitimate point, just, as a former basketball player who had a constant running friendly battle with wrestlers (which included my best friend, the team heavyweight), I had to defend "our" honor. Basketball players can make just as good football players as wrestlers do. :wink:
By the way, I was looking at the state rankings last week. Why is it that while lots of people talk about Bevins finishing second last year, and Seeley finishing first at heavyweight, no one ever never mentions that it must have been Seeley who beat Bevins in the final--since the two schools are in the same class?
I'd honestly guess that we haven't had a guy with anything close to his size and sheer athleticism on defense since since Matt Blair. That's been a while!
Didn't say that I didn't. Matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I said "thanks"! On the other hand, there is a difference between enjoying it, and recognizing that the slightest bit more effort could have made a substantial difference. After all, since this is online media, I kinda doubt that you put a limit on the number of words, as a print editor would have.
CW, perhaps I am mistaken, but it sounds like you're being a bit touchy. One reason I enjoy CF so much is the indepth analysis, the real meat, not the shallow "fluff" pieces that the print media nowadays is so accustomed to. Please pardon me if I have come not only to appreciate, but to expect a little bit higher level of performance from you and your guys.
Don't mean to sound like I'm on some high horse or something, so I'll wander along now...
I'd disagree. Reggie Hayward was a very good athlete, good enough to excel in the NFL. Both Blair and Irving are freakish athletes, especially for their size.Uh, I'm guessing Reggie Heyward (spelling) may have something very big to say about that. ISU hasn't had any other defensive end with his size and ability.
I'm very happy with the DL recruiting the past two years. 2-3 years from now, I'd love to see a starting DL made up of Irving, Aka, Pompey, and Cousin. It could be monstrous. and that's not even mentioning the other guys.
Some people wonder why we like wrestlers. What I have seen is that they just know how to use their hands and leverage and just seem to be really good tacklers. Once they get a hand on you you aren't going any further.