*** COACHING SEARCH THREAD: Friday, June 5 ***

Status
Not open for further replies.

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,889
8,375
113
Overland Park
It's also possible those mid major coaches who at least have some HC experience, winning experience, and fast paced offense experience can hire a former HC to the staff too.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,281
39,271
113
Just because a person has head coaching experience does not mean that person is automatically going to be successful at this level or at this school. It is short sighted and ignores all of the good attributes TJ brings to the table to automatically favor someone with a couple years of experience as a HC over him. The other candidates have to bring more to the table than merely having experience as a HC.

And who says they don't?

I think the list of 4 candidates all bring strengths and weaknesses to the table. None of them are head and shoulders above the others. That means that TJ will probably get the job. But it is a very good thing that they are at least talking to the other 3. Maybe one of them is just as much of a basketball genius as Hoiberg and has an amazing plan for Iowa State.
 

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
I know it's not addressed to me, but if TJ is the hire I would definitely be more comfortable if he had his own version of Lutz on the staff. Maybe someone like Herb Sendek, who was let go by Arizona State but has had some success as a head coach.

TJ would hire more than 1 assistant, right? Does the NCAA mandate a limit on a college staff? Meaning, if he kept all other staffers, he needs to replace Henry (assuming he's going w/Fred) and himself. Won't he have two to hire then? Hopefully like you say, a Lutz type, and then a great recruiter. Hopefully by saving on his salary compared to Fred, he could lure assistants with decent pay.
 

Dingus

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2013
3,050
1,286
113
TJ would hire more than 1 assistant, right? Does the NCAA mandate a limit on a college staff? Meaning, if he kept all other staffers, he needs to replace Henry (assuming he's going w/Fred) and himself. Won't he have two to hire then? Hopefully like you say, a Lutz type, and then a great recruiter. Hopefully by saving on his salary compared to Fred, he could lure assistants with decent pay.

Didn't Slice (don't even know his real name) from UK getting hired by St. John's for some huge amount? $500 k or something?

I'm ok with Otz, but I'd feel even better if he had spent the last 2 yrs under Fred and not Romar.
 
Last edited:

Yellow Snow

Full of nonsense....
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 19, 2006
2,498
2,213
113
Osage, IA
I'm honestly good with any of the candidates that we know about. It is what it is.

People seem to lose sight of the fact that Fred succeeded because he could sell his NBA contacts/experience. That is what got us players that were traditionally above our grade. TJ, MA, Corn, all had an easier sell... Hilton Magic, Hoiberg, etc. THAT is what got us in on RV, Diallo, and players like that. Not Iowa State University.

We lose that advantage no matter who we hire.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,771
62,273
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I'm honestly good with any of the candidates that we know about. It is what it is.

People seem to lose sight of the fact that Fred succeeded because he could sell his NBA contacts/experience. That is what got us players that were traditionally above our grade. TJ, MA, Corn, all had an easier sell... Hilton Magic, Hoiberg, etc. THAT is what got us in on RV, Diallo, and players like that. Not Iowa State University.

We lose that advantage no matter who we hire.

Fred got us in with those guys, but didn't land them. Not sure not getting on their list matters too much. Our bread and butter will always be the 50-125 players like Georges, Matt and Monte. I'll take those kinds of guys all day every day.
 

peachy

Active Member
Oct 14, 2006
256
84
28
Just because a person has head coaching experience does not mean that person is automatically going to be successful at this level or at this school. It is short sighted and ignores all of the good attributes TJ brings to the table to automatically favor someone with a couple years of experience as a HC over him. The other candidates have to bring more to the table than merely having experience as a HC.


And the same goes for the opposite, just because an assistant has had some recruiting success, does not mean they are going to be successful at this level or this school as a head coach.

As in the case of Prohm or Underwood, they at least have SOME track record of success as a head coach. A head coach does a lot more than just recruit (although they spend a lot of time on the recruiting trail too).

I disagree with someone having a couple of years experience should not be favored over someone with no experience. If TJ was that great of a head coach candidate, don't you think some D1 school would have snapped him up by now? I think experience as head coach when you are applying for a head coaching job should trump just about anything else. If you are applying for a job, what is the first thing they will ask you? It will be.... "Do you have experience? Oh you have no experience? Thanks, we will keep your resume on file."
 

marothisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2009
7,174
641
113
NYC
Just because a person has head coaching experience does not mean that person is automatically going to be successful at this level or at this school. It is short sighted and ignores all of the good attributes TJ brings to the table to automatically favor someone with a couple years of experience as a HC over him. The other candidates have to bring more to the table than merely having experience as a HC.

And your point is what? And you think that a person with zero head coaching experience anywhere has a better chance of being good? While it's possible, it probably isn't terribly likely unless they were an assistant under some of the best programs (i.e. Kansas, Duke, UNC, Kentucky, etc).
 

Clone_12

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
2,987
318
83
Just because a person has head coaching experience does not mean that person is automatically going to be successful at this level or at this school. It is short sighted and ignores all of the good attributes TJ brings to the table to automatically favor someone with a couple years of experience as a HC over him. The other candidates have to bring more to the table than merely having experience as a HC.

It's not just 'a couple years of experience' they have though. It's multiple years of winning conference championships, and getting their teams to max out their potential.

Nothing is a sure thing, but we're not just looking for any Joe Schmoe that's coached for a couple years. We're looking for coaches that have had success, and that get the most out of their teams.
 

idaclone

Member
Jan 20, 2010
133
4
18
Southeast Idaho
The person mentioned earlier here, who I think could keep everything going in the right direction is Krystowiak.
Qualifications:
NBA Player
NBA coaching experience
Got to the second round with Montana in the Tourney
Got to the Elite 8 in his second year in Utah, and they SUCKED bad prior to him getting the job. He does have western roots, but if he would be happy here, he could crush!
 

isu83

Active Member
May 5, 2010
686
216
43
Jamie Dixon leaving Pitt and the ACC for I-State and the B12. A bit surprise if it does happens I also wonder whether it might be a ploy on his (his agent's) part to extend or improve his current contract.

Pretty tough competition for Pitt in the ACC.
 

marothisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2009
7,174
641
113
NYC
The person mentioned earlier here, who I think could keep everything going in the right direction is Krystowiak.
Qualifications:
NBA Player
NBA coaching experience
Got to the second round with Montana in the Tourney
Got to the Elite 8 in his second year in Utah, and they SUCKED bad prior to him getting the job. He does have western roots, but if he would be happy here, he could crush!

I had thought about him but wrote him off as not on the list for some reason. That would be pretty interesting right there..
 

deadeyededric

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
15,821
13,582
113
Parts Unknown
And your point is what? And you think that a person with zero head coaching experience anywhere has a better chance of being good? While it's possible, it probably isn't terribly likely unless they were an assistant under some of the best programs (i.e. Kansas, Duke, UNC, Kentucky, etc).
Great post! We were lucky as hell that Fred turned out the way he did even with his front office credentials. I'd put my money on a guy that had a track record of winning games any day.
 

Dingus

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2013
3,050
1,286
113
And your point is what? And you think that a person with zero head coaching experience anywhere has a better chance of being good? While it's possible, it probably isn't terribly likely unless they were an assistant under some of the best programs (i.e. Kansas, Duke, UNC, Kentucky, etc).

I bet the best future HC's amongst current assistants aren't at any of those schools.
 

marothisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2009
7,174
641
113
NYC
I bet the best future HC's amongst current assistants aren't at any of those schools.

Let's put it another way then - the assistants with no head coaching experience who are most likely to get hired as a head coach into a major program are at those types of schools.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron