Exactly. Their perception of themselves is grander than reality. We have already had "those members" in the conference.....
BYU's perception when they went independant:
The real picture they're starting to see:
Exactly. Their perception of themselves is grander than reality. We have already had "those members" in the conference.....
For awhile, I was concerned with only having 10 teams. And, I know it's really only been a couple of years and "the jury's still out" on whether it will work long term. However, I am perfectly content with the way it's set up now and have no issues with it staying that way.
That said, if ND came along with BYU, I'd be just fine with that. I know it won't happen, but that's really the only way I see BYU getting an invite.
Kind of think if BYU joined, it would have been good to keep Colorado. Let Boise St or someone else go PAC-12. Would have made a little sense geographically & added (actually kept) a state with decent population & #'s of TV sets (Denver & greater area, etc), and whoopin' them the past couple years would have been fun. Still curious if they think the PAC-12 move was the proper one.
Hindsight, Louisville was definitely the one that should have been pinned down. Interesting, in looking at the link from another thread showing the total revenues for college athletic departments, Louisville is quite high (18th - higher than KU & Ok St), West Virginia is pretty high (33rd), ISU's is higher than Colorado (50th vs 53rd), and BYU is not listed (I assume because it is private) - but would have to be considered to be pretty high.
UCF before BYU. They're on the rise and just won a BCS bowl (against our champion no less). They have those rich Orlando recruiting spots. It might also open the door to FSU and possibly Clemson leaving the ACC to get into a better football conference.
Only problem is finding a partner for UCF, maybe USF to make the deal even sweeter?
If the NCAA rules that you still need 12 teams to play a conference championship game, we'll add two schools, IMO. If they change the rules and allow us to play a conference championship with our current 10 team format, I bet we stand pat.
The difference between WVU and Louisville is simple, it is like Iowa vs. Iowa State. Louisville will always be a school that is supported by alumni, and a very small regional base, where the other is a "state" or large regional brand. Like it or not, it is the truth. People from Kentucky are Kentucky fans, unless they or their children went to Louisville.
I don't understand why everyone assumes that two schools need to be added if the conference expands. If BYU makes financial sense, but no other school does, then just add BYU. The Big Ten worked with 11 schools for a really long time, so the precedents and blueprints are already available.
One other big difference between WVU and Louisville. Louisville is a commuter school, WVU is not. Louisville is the first and only commuter school to be in a P5 conference.
I don't think it's disrespectful of their beliefs to say that the conference doesn't want to have rework everything to accommodate them.
I don't disagree. As I stated earlier I'm fine with BYU having that policy if that is what they believe. I know when the whole realignment stuff exploded, BYU stood behind that belief and policy. For many different reasons, BYU did not get picked up by a major conference. It appeared to me at the time that BYU really thought they had a lot to offer and would be a valuable pick up to any major conference. Now it appears they are panicking a bit and realizing that they may indeed be left in the dark. My hypothetical question: If BYU were approached by any major conference, but the inviting conference would not abide by the Sunday policy, would BYU accept now?
One other big difference between WVU and Louisville. Louisville is a commuter school as is UCF, WVU is not. Louisville is the first and only commuter school to be in a P5 conference.
I understand this from a competitive standpoint, but none of that matters. You have to understand if from a TV contract standpoint. How much additional money would the Big 12 get by adding UCF? I would venture to guess $5 Million at most, which means each school in the Big 12 takes nearly a $1.5 Million pay cut to have UCF in the Conference. It would never get approved.
I agree. I worded that poorly. I only talked about respecting their beliefs to head off the "There is no God so screw BYU and the horse they rode in on." comments. Either they offer enough that a league is willing to accept them as they are and make a few accomodations or it isn't worth it and the league doesn't invite them. I agree with KC on that count.
That is a good question. My guess is that they have too much on the line from their world wide Mormon support to jeopardize it over something as trivial as football and basketball even if the programs are in dire straits. They will alienate a hell of a lot of their supporters if they give in on that tennant now. Again, just my guess.
What defines a commuter school? Percentage of students living on campus?
University of Louisville has a total undergraduate enrollment of 15,727, . . . At this school, 27.2 percent of the students live in college-owned, -operated, or -affiliated housing and 72.8 percent of students live off campus.
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/iowa-state-university-1869/student-life
Iowa State University has a total undergraduate enrollment of 25,555, . . . At this school, 34 percent of the students live in college-owned, -operated, or -affiliated housing and 66 percent of students live off campus.
So, is Iowa State a commuter school?
Louisville calls itself a "metropolitan university."
That is a good question. My guess is that they have too much on the line from their world wide Mormon support to jeopardize it over something as trivial as football and basketball even if the programs are in dire straits. They will alienate a hell of a lot of their supporters if they give in on that tennant now. Again, just my guess.
I think they need to add byu and another school. Having to play every team in the conference is hurting it's teams in football and not having a conference championship is even worse for the conference. I like the 10 team conference, but if they don't add a couple more teams they may get left behind
I think they need to add byu and another school. Having to play every team in the conference is hurting it's teams in football and not having a conference championship is even worse for the conference. I like the 10 team conference, but if they don't add a couple more teams they may get left behind
Mormons vs Baptist vs Christians! the only thing we are missing is Methodists
Louisville isn't even the top school in their own state! They are a fad and we all know what happens to fads.I think the BigXII missed their best chance for expansion when they didn't pickup Louisville. Louisville and BYU would have been 2 worthy additions. Now we are looking more at a scenario where if we picked up BYU we would also have to pick up an additional, less attractive school to make 12 schools. I can't think of any other quality schools out there (other that Notre Dame, but that ship has sailed).
I do agree that BYU has a pretty good market and could bring in some viewers/money to the table. They even have their own TV channel! However, scheduling would be a bit*h!