3 of our starters were 4 stars. (Niang, Morris, McKay). We had two 4 stars on the bench and in the rotation. (Thomas and BDJ). Only players who played that weren't 4 stars were Long, Nader and Hogue. So 5-8 were.
I don't think anyone is dismissing them as failures because they aren't 4 stars. They are just saying that 4 stars have a better success rate & I think we would all take a 4 star over a 3 star. That being said I agree that are always guys who outperform their rankings/offers & that some 3 stars turn out to be really good players.My point is who knows which of these new commits might turn out to be the next Naz Long or Dustin Hogue for us?
I wouldn't dimiss them as failures because they aren't 4 stars.
But go ahead if that's what makes you feel better.
I don't think anyone is dismissing them as failures because they aren't 4 stars. They are just saying that 4 stars have a better success rate & I think we would all take a 4 star over a 3 star. That being said I agree that are always guys who outperform their rankings/offers & that some 3 stars turn out to be really good players.
Not it doesn't. Just pointing out the team did have a lot of them. I'm excited about Young, Jackson and Malou whether they become 4 stars or not. I actually agree with you that they don't need to be 4 stars to make a big impact. I didn't post which ones were 4 stars to try and make you look bad. ApologiesMy point is who knows which of these new commits might turn out to be the next Naz Long or Dustin Hogue for us?
I wouldn't dimiss them as failures because they aren't 4 stars.
But go ahead if that's what makes you feel better.
Not it doesn't. Just pointing out the team did have a lot of them. I'm excited about Young, Jackson and Malou whether they become 4 stars or not. I actually agree with you that they don't need to be 4 stars to make a big impact. I didn't post which ones were 4 stars to try and make you look bad. Apologies
So he's basically McKay but can shoot 3's?Sorry if it has been talked about. Was just looking at his game logs from last year and saw that he had 9 block game. Was 1 block away from a triple double. Had some more games with 4+ blocks. I hadn't realized he was that good of a shot blocker last year. That could be really nice with McKay graduating. A 6-9 athletic wing with guard skills but the ability to get 4+ blocks and 10+ rebounds every night? #WANT
Yeah I believe I heard that he averaged 3.4 bpg and that was a pleasant surprise. Not really much he doesn't do it looks like.Sorry if it has been talked about. Was just looking at his game logs from last year and saw that he had 9 block game. Was 1 block away from a triple double. Had some more games with 4+ blocks. I hadn't realized he was that good of a shot blocker last year. That could be really nice with McKay graduating. A 6-9 athletic wing with guard skills but the ability to get 4+ blocks and 10+ rebounds every night? #WANT
#GOTSorry if it has been talked about. Was just looking at his game logs from last year and saw that he had 9 block game. Was 1 block away from a triple double. Had some more games with 4+ blocks. I hadn't realized he was that good of a shot blocker last year. That could be really nice with McKay graduating. A 6-9 athletic wing with guard skills but the ability to get 4+ blocks and 10+ rebounds every night? #WANT
Lol true. Not sure what I was thinking with the WANT hashtag.#GOT
No biggie. I just think sometimes people get this idea that Fred was this unbelievable recruiter when in all reality he was good, but not great IMO. Fred's success was due more to his offensive scheme than anything IMO, and his ability to get along so well with his players.
Fred went after quite a few high profile recruits during his time here, but didn't land any of them. So if Prohm doesn't go out and get a bunch of 4 and 5 star recruits, I wouldn't worry too much about it. That's all I'm saying.
So Monte Morris, Georges Niang, and Matt Thomas, all top 100 recruits, aren't considered "high profile recruits"? That's just a silly statement.
So Monte Morris, Georges Niang, and Matt Thomas, all top 100 recruits, aren't considered "high profile recruits"? That's just a silly statement.
Ok, you're right. Since none of these recruits Prohm has landed so far have been 4 or 5 star guys, then they are going to be worthless and after this year ISU will be horrible in basketball.
I mean, if you're not landing all top 100 guys, then you're failing, right? Is that what we're all saying? Because I don't believe that. I think Prohm is doing an excellent job so far and that these guys will all be good players.
The only point I was trying to make was that Fred wasn't bringing in classes like Kentucky, Kansas, Duke, etc. And Prohm isn't going to either. But I think Prohm is doing a great job anyway.