I would agree with your assessment but this isn't a new construction house. That is why I asked how old the house was. I can guarantee there isn't any waterproofing on the outside of the house. You then have to seal up the concrete (waterproof) from the inside unless you want to dig up your yard and apply it to the exterior. The sealant that you put on the interior isn't going to stop all the water vapor that comes through the foundation. The foundation walls will breathe from interior to exterior and since you put a vapor barrier on the backside of the drywall your drywall will stay dry and the cavity will dry out. I am not saying there isn't other ways of doing things but we have done it this way for a while and have never had a callback. If I was finishing a newer home where waterproofing was applied to the exterior I would look at doing things a little differently. JMHO
And my way might not be the right way but we had to go with something when we started finishing basements and this was the method we decided on. But who knows.
My only concern here is the possibility of mold growth due to a trap with the plastic covering behind the drywall and teh vapor barrior on the foundation wall.
Actually, by my understanding, that condensation wants to dry exterior to interior, not interior to exterior. That would only make sense considering it wants to dry to the warmer side, and since the interior is warmer it would want to dry to the warm side. This is why I believe it's suggested to not have any barrior if at all possible because you're just setting yourself up for possible mold and condensation problems.
I had a whole thing typed up, but then I saw another detail mentioned in my book, Builders Guide to Cold Climate.
It uses a foil faced rigid insulation with taped and sealed joints right next to the foundation wall. What this does is keeps the conc. wall cold and the foil does not allow the wall to dry to the interior. Because of this the only possible drying scenerio for the wall is up through the exposed part above grade. The only exception for this is that you need to allow the conc. foundation wall to dry out and equilibriate otherwise mold is possible. Being that this application is existing and has had plenty of time to dry, I think this approach of a foil based rigid foam on the wall would be best. Here you can then apply a gypsum board directly to your thermal barrier or build out a cavity wall to hold conduents and runs while also insulated with some kind of expanding foam, not a batt insulation.
Does this all make sense?
The best solution to everything is to spray Icynene insulation into your wall cavity. Breathable from the inside and waterproof. But that tends to be a big budget buster. :smile:
As explained above, I completely agree with this as well. It's also a better R-value than any batt insulation and will serve you better in energy conservation. For the same thickness of insulation, you get a 30+ addition to your R-value using the expand foam of sorts.
What type of drywall would you use below grade?
The same as you would use above grade. It's more important on the paint that you use. You want a semi-permeable (latex) paint on your wall to allow your gyp and wall to breathe as much as possible.
Well this has actually been kind of fun. Obviously there are different approaches, but finding the one that actually is good for the home is key. I honestly now think that the Foil based rigid foam might be the best approach in this situation. You want to force the wall to stay cold and to dry to the exterior.