That whole article dripped jealousy of Rutgers being in a conference that ISU desperately wants to be a part of.
That whole article dripped jealousy of Rutgers being in a conference that ISU desperately wants to be a part of.
Personally I would love to be in the big10.You're not the quickest horse in the stable, aren't you.
You're not the quickest horse in the stable, aren't you.
Personally I would love to be in the big10.
Easier conference, more money, more geographical sense
Personally I would love to be in the big10.
Easier conference, more money, more geographical sense
Agreed. At least we'd finally be on a level playing field talent-wise.
Heck, the only team we can beat consistently is in the big ten.
Personally I would love to be in the big10.
Easier conference, more money, more geographical sense
I take it these Hok trolls have nowhere else to go and are just setting up home here on CF? They must be banned from HN and HR (can't blame them for getting rid of the dumbest posters over there). We need a wall.
I'll rainbow this post if you can tell me who it really is
This one is easily explained by the fact that Iowa refused to play ISU for the two decades they set the NCAA record for most consecutive non-winning seasons (Still stands I believe.) At the same time ISU was fielding some of its best teams and would have mopped the floor with them. On the flip side, ISU was absolutely wretched from the late 80's and 90's while Iowa enjoyed some of their greatest success. Record should be almost dead even.Please explain both statements. Iowa is 41-22 all time against ISU.
How many NFL players does ISU have that you would consider ISU to be on a level playing field with other competitive members of the B1G?
Yeah but you guys talk about how KF has a losing record against ISU all the time. Four of his losses came 1999-2002, and five came over a decade ago. .
This one is easily explained by the fact that Iowa refused to play ISU for the two decades they set the NCAA record for most consecutive non-winning seasons (Still stands I believe.) At the same time ISU was fielding some of its best teams and would have mopped the floor with them. On the flip side, ISU was absolutely wretched from the late 80's and 90's while Iowa enjoyed some of their greatest success. Record should be almost dead even.
The why are you so obsessed with us?Haha...ISU has been wretched except for a few seasons here and there since their existence.
Please explain both statements. Iowa is 41-22 all time against ISU.
How many NFL players does ISU have that you would consider ISU to be on a level playing field with other competitive members of the B1G?
I agree. The old version of these same trolls were great because they would come here to boast about their basketball program and try to put ours down. These new iterations seem to have learned their lesson, avoid the basketball threads like the plague, and only want "serious" discussions about how great (overrated) their foosball team is.These new Hawk trolls ******* suck. @GTO you should start a poll to see which Hawk troll is allowed to be unbanned and maybe the mods will honor it. Let's get some of that OG stuff back here that made this board fun.
I thought your timeframe in your 'solid' posts were the last 15 years?
Candy and nuts are a pretty ****** Christmas present, man.
TWSS or TWHS. Gotta include both with hawks.So I am the quickest horse in the stable??