Add JFC to the naughty list

[NWICY]

Jesus Soaking Christ

The Mormon version

 

[NWICY]

Beat the sin out of the world. It is the way.

 

[SwirlyBird]

OP you should pray about it at church today

 

[NWICY]

I'm not Catholic.

Fundamentalist?

 

[motorcy90]

Just get rid of the language filters. I’m tired of counting asterisks to guess which naughty word was used.

well is it **** or ****?

 

[motorcy90]

 

[Gunnerclone]

OP you should pray about it at church today

He could have just waited, prayed it away, then no problem. But no, had to pontificate about it on an online sports message board. Classic Jesus.

 

[Cyclonsin]

The fact this topic has warranted 7 pages worth of conversation is JFC worthy.

 

[Hawktj]

Sorry, I'm not asking you to follow Jesus. That's up to you. I just find those 3 words used together as terribly offensive. But I agree with many, let's not censor anything if this isn't considered as offensive as other curse words.

Contrary to this thread, I'm actually really laid back and several people on here can vouch.

I was just giving feedback. I should have known better.

I’m primarily a Hawk fan and said exactly the same thing on a Hawk board. Unfortunately got similar responses and I’m sure I’ll add to the childish comments you are getting here by supporting you. It’s very disappointing to see what our society has evolved to. Hang in there!

 

[JEFF420]

BAN THE HAWK FANS!!

 

[Cyched]

BAN THE HAWK FANS!!

About time somebody posted a unifying idea in this thread

 

[CySmurf]

Are BYU’s message boards leaking onto CF?

The magic underwear isn't holding it in...

 

[CyMissile]

Because it deserves a negative response. He admitted his entire 'problem' was religiously-based, and thus he is trying to force his religiously-based sensitivities onto other people. That's garbage behavior, not to mention unamerican.

Politely asking for a little bit of decency is not garbage behavior or un-American.

 

[cycloneG]

Politely asking for a little bit of decency is not garbage behavior or un-American.

It depends on your point of view. I don't view the use of JFC as indecent. It's simply an exclamation.

 

[flycy]

Maybe stop trying to force your religious beliefs onto other people.

This is ridiculous, there are a number of things that are blocked out because some fringe group finds it offensive. Only when it might offend groups not considered fringe is it for some reason OK. Either the OP's point is valid, or all should be unblocked. I'm fine with either but right now the policy is very inconsistent. I find the phrase offensive, but I'm not necessarily of the opinion that I need to be protected from offensive dicks on here.

Edit: You ****, just wanted to see if the nonplural was blocked since someone claimed it was. There you go, just make it plural.

 

[cycloneG]

This is ridiculous, there are a number of things that are blocked out because some fringe group finds it offensive. Only when it might offend groups not considered fringe is it for some reason OK. Either the OP's point is valid, or all should be unblocked. I'm fine with either but right now the policy is very inconsistent. I find the phrase offensive, but I'm not necessarily of the opinion that I need to be protected from offensive dicks on here.

Edit: You ****, just wanted to see if the nonplural was blocked since someone claimed it was. There you go, just make it plural.

I wasn't aware of this. Can you give some examples?

 

[alarson]

Politely asking for a little bit of decency is not garbage behavior or un-American.

He literally admitted he wanted it censored because it was against his religious beliefs. The J was what he found offensive. That's pushing his religion on everyone else.

And yes, doing that absolutely is garbage behavior.

This is ridiculous, there are a number of things that are blocked out because some fringe group finds it offensive. Only when it might offend groups not considered fringe is it for some reason OK. Either the OP's point is valid, or all should be unblocked. I'm fine with either but right now the policy is very inconsistent. I find the phrase offensive, but I'm not necessarily of the opinion that I need to be protected from offensive dicks on here.

Edit: You ****, just wanted to see if the nonplural was blocked since someone claimed it was. There you go, just make it plural.

I would be fine with dropping the filters entirely. But most words that are filtered are filtered because they are commonly 'profane' words. The standard stuff your average OTA tv network would bleep.

Weird that you turn it into a "help, the Christians are being oppressed if we can't push ourselves onto others" narrative though

 

[jmb]

This is ridiculous, there are a number of things that are blocked out because some fringe group finds it offensive. Only when it might offend groups not considered fringe is it for some reason OK. Either the OP's point is valid, or all should be unblocked. I'm fine with either but right now the policy is very inconsistent. I find the phrase offensive, but I'm not necessarily of the opinion that I need to be protected from offensive dicks on here.

Edit: You ****, just wanted to see if the nonplural was blocked since someone claimed it was. There you go, just make it plural.

Offended. Lol. I am offended you are offended.

 

[cayin]

the thing is most Christians miss what don't take the lords name in vain means. It is not saying his name, if that is the case then God is some authoritarian insecure prick. No, what it really is about is people like Joel Olstreem using the lord to take advantage of people.

 

[CyMissile]

the thing is most Christians miss what don't take the lords name in vain means. It is not saying his name, if that is the case then God is some authoritarian insecure prick. No, what it really is about is people like Joel Olstreem using the lord to take advantage of people.

This is not accurate. The Joel Osteen analogy is correct, but only as a small fraction of "Don't take the Lord's name on vain" full meaning. Using the name of God as a profanity is 100% part of it as well.