2024-2025 MBB computer projections thread

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,247
55,139
113
Pretty sure that @Tech game was a projected loss earlier. That would be a token win.
 

rosshm16

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 8, 2023
5,190
8,471
113
The #6 team in the country projects as a 3-seed?
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,417
39,207
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
Who's Bruce Underwood?
Related to this guy?
Chuck_Bruce.jpg
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
54,353
47,015
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
If we can get 2 of the 5 of @Tech, @WVU, @KU, @Houston, @ Zona, I'd sign up for it. My hope is we can do 16-4 or better.
And 4 of those 5 are in the next 9 games.

If we split the rest of the schedule into "next 9" and "last 9", the next 9 is tough and key to the season - the last 9 is pretty easy, compared to recent conference schedules, with only @Houston in the middle - then Arizona coming to Hilton in early March (they could be rolling... or dead, who knows with that team)

The next 9 has two key, tough, stretches -
after the Utah game we go @Tech, KU in Hilton, @WVU. Two really tough places to play against potentially good, but relatively unknown teams, with Bill Self and company coming to Ames in between. 2/3 would be a success - 1/3 wouldn't be the end of the word.

Then a brief breather with UCF coming to town, before we play the two Sat/Mon turnarounds - @ASU/@AU; then the next weekend KSU / @KU- maybe KSU will still be a dumpster fire, but that's a huge trap game, especially if we in Arizona and are looking to head to Lawrence a Top 5 team. (Kansas plays @ Baylor that Saturday!)
 

NENick

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
2,549
4,266
113
If we can get 2 of the 5 of @Tech, @WVU, @KU, @Houston, @ Zona, I'd sign up for it. My hope is we can do 16-4 or better.
3 of 5 would be great, but I'd throw ASU in there too. That AZ/ASU trip will be interesting. A sweep would be awesome, one of 2, ok.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,908
41,570
113
Waukee
Cusp of a #1 seed on Torvik...

1736187151168.png

Looking very good for Milwaukee so far...

Cleveland = #7 Florida, #9 Kentucky
Denver = #11 Mississippi St., #12 UCLA
Lexington = #1 Auburn, #2 Tennessee
Milwaukee = #5 Iowa St., #5 Illinois
Providence = #13 Kansas, #14 Michigan
Raleigh = #3 Duke, #4 Alabama
Seattle = #15 Texas A&M, #16 Gonzaga
Wichita = #6 Houston, #10 Marquette

Staying ahead of 1/2 of Illinois or Kansas should lock in Milwaukee for the first weekend.

Indianapolis would be very nice for the second weekend...

1736187522439.png
 

CychiatricWard

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 27, 2017
3,490
4,231
113
35
Des Moines
SEC is tough but those teams are going to separate once they start playing each other. I don’t see any way possible one conference gets theee #1 seeds
They won’t, but it could be close. Depends on how well and Houston do as the season progresses. I think the ones, if i had to guess now, will be Auburn, ISU, Duke, and another SEC team.
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
This argument was made during the Hoiberg years.

"Sure the offense is fun, but the defense isn't good. That problem will put a ceiling on their success."

"No no no! You don't get it! They can turn it on when they need to! And they have some absolute killers who know how to close out games at the end like Royce White and Georges Niang!"

Maybe that argument is true 95% of the time. But that 5% can ruin a season.

In terms of March success, I think the belief in them turning it up is basically true philosophically speaking. There isn’t a system that prevents outlier (5%) from ruining a season, or that it won’t show up March

Where it matters is in winning regular season games that in theory set you up with a more forgiving path on March. We didn’t exactly grind out wins on random Tuesday winter nights, and that left a few Hoiberg and Prohm teams facing a tougher challenge in ncaa

For me , that Royce team in particular a missed opportunity, and is a Sweet 16 or better had they been more consistent in the regular season. The following year we were better than a 10 seed, and our tournament performance good enough for S16 had we been a better seed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,221
13,095
113
Augusta National Golf Club
If we can get 2 of the 5 of @Tech, @WVU, @KU, @Houston, @ Zona, I'd sign up for it. My hope is we can do 16-4 or better.
16-4 seems aggressive to me as 10/16 teams are top 52 in the NET and everyone knows K-State is a dangerous team despite their current NET ranking...

I'd be very happy with 15-5 or 14-6, as long as we defend home court. Then all you have to do is win roughly half the games on the road, which we already have one. Here is a teamcast on Torvik I love to use (mostly later in the year)


1736190924655.png


If you don't think we win the tournament in KC, then I would say 15-5 and 1-1 in the conference tournament, which may also get you into the #1 seed, depending on who the losses are to.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,867
13,929
113
And 4 of those 5 are in the next 9 games.

If we split the rest of the schedule into "next 9" and "last 9", the next 9 is tough and key to the season - the last 9 is pretty easy, compared to recent conference schedules, with only @Houston in the middle - then Arizona coming to Hilton in early March (they could be rolling... or dead, who knows with that team)

The next 9 has two key, tough, stretches -
after the Utah game we go @Tech, KU in Hilton, @WVU. Two really tough places to play against potentially good, but relatively unknown teams, with Bill Self and company coming to Ames in between. 2/3 would be a success - 1/3 wouldn't be the end of the word.

Then a brief breather with UCF coming to town, before we play the two Sat/Mon turnarounds - @ASU/@AU; then the next weekend KSU / @KU- maybe KSU will still be a dumpster fire, but that's a huge trap game, especially if we in Arizona and are looking to head to Lawrence a Top 5 team. (Kansas plays @ Baylor that Saturday!)

I made a chart with Torvik data and a wag adjustment for home/away a week or so ago. It looks like this:
1736192077964.png

Utah should be cake, but the next 3 games are huge for how this season is going to turn out. 3 of the top 7 difficulty.

Also note the big drop off for those "easy" games. 6 of those 9 games are from week 10 -- so 6 "easy" games out of the last 11. Compared to only 3 of the first 9. And at KSU is week 10, and the hardest of the easy games.

Reference, ISU is 950 on this scale, 990 at home.
 

Attachments

  • 1736192117455.png
    1736192117455.png
    24.7 KB · Views: 12