Torvick has us as a 2.5 projected seed. I don't understand it either.The #6 team in the country projects as a 3-seed?
Who's Bruce Underwood?Bruce Underwood is a crazy underrated coach - he lost EVERYONE from the team that beat us last year, started over from scratch with a bunch of transfers and eastern European players and is back in the KenPom top 10.
The media will build up a couple B1G teams as monsters in the next 2 months. Also, "The Big XII is down this year." Haven't you heard?The #6 team in the country projects as a 3-seed?
The #6 team in the country projects as a 3-seed?
Brad's secret assistantWho's Bruce Underwood?
And 4 of those 5 are in the next 9 games.If we can get 2 of the 5 of @Tech, @WVU, @KU, @Houston, @ Zona, I'd sign up for it. My hope is we can do 16-4 or better.
3 of 5 would be great, but I'd throw ASU in there too. That AZ/ASU trip will be interesting. A sweep would be awesome, one of 2, ok.If we can get 2 of the 5 of @Tech, @WVU, @KU, @Houston, @ Zona, I'd sign up for it. My hope is we can do 16-4 or better.
I was thinking his name is Bruce "Weber" Underwood.Brad's secret assistant
They won’t, but it could be close. Depends on how well and Houston do as the season progresses. I think the ones, if i had to guess now, will be Auburn, ISU, Duke, and another SEC team.SEC is tough but those teams are going to separate once they start playing each other. I don’t see any way possible one conference gets theee #1 seeds
This argument was made during the Hoiberg years.
"Sure the offense is fun, but the defense isn't good. That problem will put a ceiling on their success."
"No no no! You don't get it! They can turn it on when they need to! And they have some absolute killers who know how to close out games at the end like Royce White and Georges Niang!"
Maybe that argument is true 95% of the time. But that 5% can ruin a season.
16-4 seems aggressive to me as 10/16 teams are top 52 in the NET and everyone knows K-State is a dangerous team despite their current NET ranking...If we can get 2 of the 5 of @Tech, @WVU, @KU, @Houston, @ Zona, I'd sign up for it. My hope is we can do 16-4 or better.
And 4 of those 5 are in the next 9 games.
If we split the rest of the schedule into "next 9" and "last 9", the next 9 is tough and key to the season - the last 9 is pretty easy, compared to recent conference schedules, with only @Houston in the middle - then Arizona coming to Hilton in early March (they could be rolling... or dead, who knows with that team)
The next 9 has two key, tough, stretches -
after the Utah game we go @Tech, KU in Hilton, @WVU. Two really tough places to play against potentially good, but relatively unknown teams, with Bill Self and company coming to Ames in between. 2/3 would be a success - 1/3 wouldn't be the end of the word.
Then a brief breather with UCF coming to town, before we play the two Sat/Mon turnarounds - @ASU/@AU; then the next weekend KSU / @KU- maybe KSU will still be a dumpster fire, but that's a huge trap game, especially if we in Arizona and are looking to head to Lawrence a Top 5 team. (Kansas plays @ Baylor that Saturday!)