When Tiger was in his prime, there were other golfers I rooted for more. Nothing really against Tiger- just more in my personality to cheer for the underdog.
As Tiger has aged, I find myself pulling for him more. I have no illusions that he will return as a top tier golfer that he once was. To be honest that's been my perspective for the last decade. The reality is not many golfers (other than maybe VJ Sing) play their best golf after about the age of 35.
As a golf fan, to think that Tiger isn't good for the PGA Tour is delusional. He don't have to be elite to bring eyes to the game. Afterall, he is A LIVING SPORT LEGEND. Right up there with Michael Jordan, Derek Jeter and Tom Brady
That kind of longevity will be tough. At 46 and all the back and knee issues he dealt with before his auto accident- I think his window for being competitive on the PGA Tour might be 3-5 years at best. I think it's going to be tough to transform his game (drive accurately & elite putter) at this late age.I think if Tiger can be somewhat healthy he can play for another 10 ish years on tour. He will likely play about 1/3 of the schedule, maybe, each year with the majors being the big ones he would obviously try and play. There are certainly courses, Augusta among others, that suit his style and could sneak a win or two in every year potentially.
Never will be get back, but I could honestly see one more major for him at either The Masters, or The Open over the next 5 or 6 years.
When Tiger was in his prime, there were other golfers I rooted for more. Nothing really against Tiger- just more in my personality to cheer for the underdog.
As Tiger has aged, I find myself pulling for him more. I have no illusions that he will return as a top tier golfer that he once was. To be honest that's been my perspective for the last decade. The reality is not many golfers (other than maybe VJ Sing) play their best golf after about the age of 35.
As a golf fan, to think that Tiger isn't good for the PGA Tour is delusional. He don't have to be elite to bring eyes to the game. Afterall, he is A LIVING SPORT LEGEND. Right up there with Michael Jordan, Derek Jeter and Tom Brady
St. Andrews is beckoning…I think if Tiger can be somewhat healthy he can play for another 10 ish years on tour. He will likely play about 1/3 of the schedule, maybe, each year with the majors being the big ones he would obviously try and play. There are certainly courses, Augusta among others, that suit his style and could sneak a win or two in every year potentially.
Never will be get back, but I could honestly see one more major for him at either The Masters, or The Open over the next 5 or 6 years.
Tiger is good for the sport because he is a legend. But I think the PGA is moving beyond Tiger with young guys like Rahm, Scheffler, Morikawa, Havland, Zalatoris, Thomas, DeChambeau, Smith, Schauffele, Koepke & Spieth. Add a couple old guys like Johnson & McIlroy and I am pretty excited to watch pro golf.Tiger’s still is the WHOLE tour IMO. There’s a reason he just won the Player Impact Program and was given an $8 million bonus despite not playing at all.
The purses of these C and D level tournaments is only so high because of Tiger. Professional golf desperately needs someone to step up and win more than 2-3 majors. Spieth and 50 year old Phil are the only guys who have even come close to Tiger’s appeal.
That said, I hope Tigers wins next Sunday
Tiger is good for the sport because he is a legend. But I think the PGA is moving beyond Tiger with young guys like Rahm, Scheffler, Morikawa, Havland, Zalatoris, Thomas, DeChambeau, Smith, Schauffele, Koepke & Spieth. Add a couple old guys like Johnson & McIlroy and I am pretty excited to watch pro golf.
The Tiger effect has created a tour where there the talent is deeper than ever before.
I agree that’s it’s deeper than ever, but to the average sport fan, none of those guys move the needle for engagement. And unless someone emerges from the pack by winning a few majors, I doubt they ever will
I consider myself a die hard golf fan, but outside the Saudi drama, golf right now is very bland.
I wouldn't call it bland, but it does need a superstar frontrunner or twoI agree that’s it’s deeper than ever, but to the average sport fan, none of those guys move the needle for engagement. And unless someone emerges from the pack by winning a few majors, I doubt they ever will
I consider myself a die hard golf fan, but outside the Saudi drama, golf right now is very bland.
I wouldn't call it bland, but it does need a superstar frontrunner or two
No way, I'm sure the average person was hooked to their TV this weekend watching JJ Spaun duke it out with Adam Hadwin and Matt Jones.NLU has a great test to show how bad golf is right now by asking who won the last version of a tournament. Such as who won at Torrey this winter? I couldn’t tell you and I watched part of it.
There are too many players and too many tournaments. There is a reason that the Saudi’s got traction with their proposals. Top 50 players in 15-20 tournaments a year is really all the market can handle without being flooded
No way, I'm sure the average person was hooked to their TV this weekend watching JJ Spaun duke it out with Adam Hadwin and Matt Jones.
The broadcast had a tinge of embarrassment to it.No way, I'm sure the average person was hooked to their TV this weekend watching JJ Spaun duke it out with Adam Hadwin and Matt Jones.
NLU has a great test to show how bad golf is right now by asking who won the last version of a tournament. Such as who won at Torrey this winter? I couldn’t tell you and I watched part of it.
There are too many players and too many tournaments. There is a reason that the Saudi’s got traction with their proposals. Top 50 players in 15-20 tournaments a year is really all the market can handle without being flooded