I appreciated finding out how many people were in the room with the Citadel guy.
Some of the yes/no questions really weren't fair and were short sighted. However, I don't feel bad for the Citadel guy and Robinhood CEO basically being treated like ****.
You could tell Ken Griffen had some lawyer in the back typing out on a teleprompter telling him what to say.
I wanted two questions asked none of which directly were
1) Citadel invests in Melvin Capital on Monday. Robinhood to that point had major swings in capital needs on Thursday, Friday, and Monday of that week - however didn't feel the need to restrict the stock until Wednesday - two days after Citadel invests in Melvin Capital. Are you saying this is just a coincidence? How did Robinhood meet capital needs earlier in that week - because stock moved just as much on Monday & Tuesday of that week.
2) Robinhood decided to shut down access to 7-10 stocks on Wednesday am at roughly 6am. At the same exact time 10-15 other brokerages made the same exact call and are not involved in the hearing. Did other brokerages have the same liquidity problems at the same exact time?