Our basketball team should just be 5 PGs and have zero rebounds.
Rebounds? Where we're going, we don't need rebounds.
Our basketball team should just be 5 PGs and have zero rebounds.
The emphasis on State is A OK with meIs it irrational to get annoyed with the "iSu" in some of these posts?
I don't see a problem with LW, Haliburton, and Harris playing at the same time. Halliburton can guard a traditional 3 and LW a 2. Having 2 and 3 guys on the court with PG skills is a coach's dream.
Welcome aboard. I didn't realize he was a PG, thought he was more of a wing shooter.
I love the idea of Wiggington or Haliburton running the point with a bunch of 6'5" to 6'7" guys on the wings with a single big that can run. Jay Billas will be beside himself with our length.
I initially thought Harris was a must, but if we get THT and Conditt to finish this class, I'll be over the moon.
So is he expected to be primarily a PG? Not at all saying he'll be the #2 pick overall so don't twist my words, but at 6'6 I'm imagining a Lonzo Ball type of player
I agree about Monte. For 4 years we've been able to take for granted that our point guard did not turn the ball over. If he did I always thought, "That's weird." If it happened twice in a game I wondered if something was wrong.I'd still love to get Harris. We're so used to a PG who can beat his man off the dribble and make the right pass which I think he can absolutely do. We've been so spoiled with Monte for 4 years it's gonna be tough to transition.
If he is filling his pants does he need to start wearing a diaper?I have the deepest respect for Prohm. He has bigger pants to fill.
This thread makes me happy.Just ask us not to tangent into Fred while you're at it, or talk about the blarge.
I'd still love to get Harris. We're so used to a PG who can beat his man off the dribble and make the right pass which I think he can absolutely do. We've been so spoiled with Monte for 4 years it's gonna be tough to transition.
Is there a reason Harris was moved off the Top Target line on 247?