*** Official #8 IOWA STATE vs #5 Houston Game(Day) Thread ***

bosco

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2008
9,843
7,730
113
Des Moines
It is. He said Heise didn't move, the problem is, Heise does move.

I don't like the call, I've said it already. But it is correct.
Of course it's correct because it's the interpretation of what the ref considers is the cylinder. If they called it a foul on Cyer that would be correct too.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: NENick

ExCyment

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2013
1,938
1,118
113
Crescent, IA
I know what a bad call is, but I also know how to read, so I know that was not a bad call. If you would like to read the rules to become more acquainted with what you can or can't do in basketball, there is a free rulebook you can download from the NCAA website.

You are just parroting Jay Bilas, and he was wrong. A player can crowd them like Heise did, but if there is contact, its a foul on them.
He didn't crowd him, there was space when
Cryer didn't even step forward. He didn't even move his feet until after the contact.
Cryer had established his position and Heise his defensive position. Cryer then pivoted and took a large step with his non pivot foot into Heise. He is allowed to do that, but the pivot step does not establish a new expanded cylinder. Heise maintained his previously established legal guarding position. Cryer then swung the ball elbowing Heise in the jaw.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: NENick and fcclone

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,797
64,791
113
LA LA Land
That's pretty clear offensive foul to me. Cryer initiated all the contact

One idiot on here I think is claiming Heise isn't allowed that tiny tiny tiny shuffle of his feet, as if he's trying to take a charge in the lane and needs to stand there like a freaking statue.

We have some "special" people here.
 

Texbudman

Well-Known Member
Nov 20, 2012
721
1,278
93
Arlington,Tx
Countdown to a more healthy Keshon. If they really want to get him healthy they'll probably give him a week off and he returns next weekend for Arizona in Ames.

Today shows why Houston might not be a great tourney team. Not a lot of offense, rely on a lot of individual stuff, and very hard shot making. Lot of those days that slop won't fall.
I think our defense had a lot to do with their offense struggling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,607
4,900
113
Of course we do. Get off it. Cryer headhunted and got off with a technicality. Good for him.

Now, let's discuss the other 6-8 completely lousy calls that affected the game now, shall we?

Does it make you feel better for the officials to be technically right once?

I really wished for once I could go through a whole game without having to listen to someone defend the officials when they completely blow calls. It is just getting frustrating having to listen to these whiners on the game board.

You want to talk about whining? Pot meet kettle. Holy cow.

The calls you usually get upset about are called pretty consistently both was. There were one or two games where I specifically thought it got out of control, but the officials arent robots. They will miss one or 2 generally. But overall they make

The refs did not lose this game. a 9 minute scoring drought in the first half did this. Missing 2 starters did this. They lost to a team that was better TODAY because of unforeseen circumstances. Blaming officials is so weak.
 

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,607
4,900
113
One idiot on here I think is claiming Heise isn't allowed that tiny tiny tiny shuffle of his feet, as if he's trying to take a charge in the lane and needs to stand there like a freaking statue.

We have some "special" people here.

Once he moves his feet, it resets the guarding position. It's really not hard to understand.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,797
64,791
113
LA LA Land
Yeah, Heise actually moved back when he pivoted giving him more room and Cryer still threw the elbow.

I think some people think he needs to stand there like a statue as if he's taking a charge in the lane.

He never moves into him, Cryer moves into Heise, he moves backward a tiny bit and shuffles his feet just slightly but defensive players are allowed to move their feet in this sport.

Good lord some of our fans would probably chop their own nuts off before admitting an obviously blown call is a blown call.
 

StLouisClone

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
8,013
595
113
St. Louis
I never saw them hang their head. The fans were pissed off. But that doesn't mean anything.
Agreed. Just saying ISU had their chances down 1 with 8 minutes left and down 2 with 4 minutes left. From that point forward, Houston took control of the game. So I can't say the refs cost us the game.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,797
64,791
113
LA LA Land
Once he moves his feet, it resets the guarding position. It's really not hard to understand.

No it doesn't, cryer moves into him creating the contact to the face. Both players are allowed to move.

You don't know **** about basketball. Sometimes refs blow calls and you're not a "tough guy" on this, you're being a stupid contrarian.
 

AllInForISU

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
4,607
4,900
113
He didn't crowd him, there was space when

Cryer had established his position and Heise his defensive position. Cryer then pivoted and took a large step with his non pivot foot into Heise. He is allowed to do that, but the pivot step does not establish a new expanded cylinder. Heise maintained his previously established legal guarding position. Cryer then swung the ball elbowing Heise in the jaw.

I understand what you are saying. But when Heise readjusts, which he does right after the pivot, he also reset his guarding position. That is why in real time it was called an offensive foul, that is so hard to see as an official, but when reviewed they slow it down and make the call based on the letter of the law.

Personally though, I don't know why cylinder fouls can get reviewed at any time, but things like out of bounds can't.
 

Cloned4Life

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 5, 2006
3,581
3,339
113
I'm not talking about a computer assessment. I'm talking about being able to run an offense and get a bucket that isn't a one on one, step back three. On a neutral court, season in the line, those are a lot tougher. They will play plenty of teams that match them defensively in the tournament.
LOL are we really doing this? Houston is a fantastic team. An ELITE team. A legit 1 seed contender. They steamrolled through the Big 12 in back to back seasons. They are the BEST defense in college basketball. No, factually, “plenty” of teams will not be able to match their defensive intensity, just like many won’t be able to match ours. Their offensive is ALSO great. Factually one of the most efficient. Better than ours. Them hitting step-backs and having multiple guards that can score in ANY way(and go off for 25+) is a feature, not a bug. We had Curtis Jones go nuclear against KU and ASU, and we maybe don’t win those games if he isn’t on fire. Guess what - that doesn’t mean our offense isn’t still really, really good.

And with all of that said - we gave them a damn good game today. Our defense was so damn good, even without 2 of our best guards, that the ONLY way they could beat us is if they shot lights out. And they did! Because they are really damn good. They didn’t just get lucky and shoot out of their ass when normally they are terrible. They are legit one of the best shooting teams in CBB.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,135
55,040
113
It’s not sports-frustrating when the opposing team drains monster shot after shot after shot, regardless of the level of difficulty!?

I might seriously need your help to understand how that’s not “frustrating at all”! Sincerely.

I find the made shots far less frustrating than the weird cylindar call and the push off for the three soon after, or like in prior games with the weird turnovers that kept teams like Cinci and UCF around.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron