I have a feeling semi drivers, snow plows, people with campers, trailers would not like roundabouts with interior lane curbs.
Yeah I'll go with 'slow to 10/15, and read the lane lines and signs' approach.
I have a feeling semi drivers, snow plows, people with campers, trailers would not like roundabouts with interior lane curbs.
A few yrs back someone must have been pissed about getting a tkt from one of those vans,because they torched one in Ft. Dodge one night. LOL.We have speed trap vans all over the place here. I get speeding tickets in the mail all the time from these things, and those tickets go straight in the trash.
When it takes a picture of a person's plate, a very bright flash goes off. I'm just waiting until it temporarily blinds someone and causes an accident and they get sued.
I get your point but the speed isn't always set by an engineer when designing a road. For example I used to know a guy who worked for the city of Story City. The speed limit was originally higher on a lot of the roads in town but the City decided unilaterally to lower them. It certainly kept the cops busy.42 in a 30 is almost 1.5 X the speed the engineers came up with to determine a safe speed.
Beyond the limit posted that's likely not a safe speed vs. the conditions or hazards present.
I couldn’t find anything on the Prairie City one which imo is the biggest bullsh*t camera in the state as it’s not even in town, it’s on a relatively straight flat stretch of road, and it’s on a state highway not a city road.Thank you DOT
![]()
Majority of traffic cameras nixed by Iowa DOT under new law
The DOT on Monday approved only 11 fixed automated traffic enforcement cameras across the state while denying requests for 128 otherswww.thegazette.com
I haven't been able to find which one in Des Moines is staying.
There will now be fixed automated traffic cameras in just five Iowa cities: four each in Cedar Rapids and Davenport, and one each in Des Moines, Marshalltown and Le Claire.
And this right here is all you need to hear to realize it's 99% about money.
“While revenue generation is not the program’s goal, we are also evaluating financial impacts. We are considering our next steps.”
Gone!I couldn’t find anything on the Prairie City one which imo is the biggest bullsh*t camera in the state as it’s not even in town, it’s on a relatively straight flat stretch of road, and it’s on a state highway not a city road.
The article says that camera was among the rejected ones. Along with Webster City. Those cameras were every bit as bs as Prairie City one.I couldn’t find anything on the Prairie City one which imo is the biggest bullsh*t camera in the state as it’s not even in town, it’s on a relatively straight flat stretch of road, and it’s on a state highway not a city road.
I couldn’t find anything on the Prairie City one which imo is the biggest bullsh*t camera in the state as it’s not even in town, it’s on a relatively straight flat stretch of road, and it’s on a state highway not a city road.
Webster City says "hi"I couldn’t find anything on the Prairie City one which imo is the biggest bullsh*t camera in the state as it’s not even in town, it’s on a relatively straight flat stretch of road, and it’s on a state highway not a city road.
That's probably why the DOT is allowing them to stay? or are these not the ones?That brings up what at least I believe is an interesting aspect of these as clearly the CR ones that most people hate are on 380. If the city is not allowed to enforce the laws in a manner they see fit on a road going through their city does that mean it falls solely on the ISP? If accidents happen due to high speed and other bad driving behaviors that put a strain on other city resources (Fire/EMS) where does the line get drawn?
The CR ones on 380 are at places where speed has been a danger in the past. Further, this area is dangerous if not impossible for LEOs to safely execute a traffic stop without endangering themselves or other motorists. I don't like the premise of the cameras and there absolutely is a financial aspect to them but every instance is not equal.
That brings up what at least I believe is an interesting aspect of these as clearly the CR ones that most people hate are on 380. If the city is not allowed to enforce the laws in a manner they see fit on a road going through their city does that mean it falls solely on the ISP? If accidents happen due to high speed and other bad driving behaviors that put a strain on other city resources (Fire/EMS) where does the line get drawn?
The CR ones on 380 are at places where speed has been a danger in the past. Further, this area is dangerous if not impossible for LEOs to safely execute a traffic stop without endangering themselves or other motorists. I don't like the premise of the cameras and there absolutely is a financial aspect to them but every instance is not equal.
That's probably why the DOT is allowing them to stay? or are these not the ones?
- I-380 at Diagonal Drive (NB)
- I-30 at J Avenue (SB)
- Williams Boulevard at 16 Avenue SW (NB)
- Williams Boulevard at 16 th Avenue SW (SB)
Okay that part is on me. I read it last night and obviously still struggle with reading comprehension or paying attention to which list I was looking at.If you had read the linked article you would have learned the two on I-380 were among those approved to stay.
The article says that camera was among the rejected ones. Along with Webster City. Those cameras were every bit as bs as Prairie City one.
**** that one in Webster City.The article says that camera was among the rejected ones. Along with Webster City. Those cameras were every bit as bs as Prairie City one.
Yeah, let's just ignore the reduction in fatal crashes.Thank you DOT
![]()
Majority of traffic cameras nixed by Iowa DOT under new law
The DOT on Monday approved only 11 fixed automated traffic enforcement cameras across the state while denying requests for 128 otherswww.thegazette.com
I haven't been able to find which one in Des Moines is staying.
There will now be fixed automated traffic cameras in just five Iowa cities: four each in Cedar Rapids and Davenport, and one each in Des Moines, Marshalltown and Le Claire.
And this right here is all you need to hear to realize it's 99% about money.
“While revenue generation is not the program’s goal, we are also evaluating financial impacts. We are considering our next steps.”
I got a ticket at the LeClaire one on the way to Chicago and 3 days later on the way back I got a ticket at the same location. I counted the number of tickets between the two and during those three days they would have made around $300,000 in tickets. It was over the weekend, so probably slightly higher, but that camera makes roughly $100,000 A DAY.
There historically have been 4 on I-380 in CR. 2 were approved and 2 were rejected.If you had read the linked article you would have learned the two on I-380 were among those approved to stay.
You sure that counter was for a single camera and not all cameras for that company?I got a ticket at the LeClaire one on the way to Chicago and 3 days later on the way back I got a ticket at the same location. I counted the number of tickets between the two and during those three days they would have made around $300,000 in tickets. It was over the weekend, so probably slightly higher, but that camera makes roughly $100,000 A DAY.