Subscribe to this guy on YouTube! He does a good job with posting both full games and abbreviated games!
*** Official #18 IOWA STATE vs Houston Game(Day) Thread ***
- Thread starter CycloneRulzzz
- Start date
And ESPN writers have BYU and KSU picked as Big 12 Champions:
Bowl projections: Fallout from Ole Miss, Utah upsets and Bama-Georgia thriller
Week 5 brings the biggest shake-ups of the season in the playoff field and the rest of the bowl matchups.
www.espn.com
K State looked really good yesterday.And ESPN writers have BYU and KSU picked as Big 12 Champions:
Bowl projections: Fallout from Ole Miss, Utah upsets and Bama-Georgia thriller
Week 5 brings the biggest shake-ups of the season in the playoff field and the rest of the bowl matchups.
I couldn't find an exact definition of this rule.
"Ineligible Receivers Downfield
One of the most common penalties called in regard to eligible receivers is the "ineligible receiver downfield."This rule is in place to prevent offensive linemen from going too far downfield to block before the actual throw.
You will see this penalty called most often on screen passes to running backs, when offensive linemen "release" from their pass-blocking stance to go downfield and try to block too soon.
The rule states that an ineligible receiver can't go outside of the neutral zone before a pass is thrown.
This means offensive linemen must stay within that neutral zone and can't "release" to block downfield on a passing play until the pass is actually released from the quarterback's hand.
When an ineligible receiver downfield penalty is called, it results in the offensive team losing five yards. Whatever play actually happened will be canceled out, and the offense will repeat the down."
What is an Ineligible Receiver? (Full Explanation)
In a football game, not every player on offense is actually eligible to receive a pass. Here's how to know who can and can't receive passes.
footballadvantage.com
So, what constitutes "the neutral zone" in this case? Obviously this is different than the 'neutral zone' on an off-sides call.
I’m not sure destroyed is adequately describing that game
It’s 3 yardsI couldn't find an exact definition of this rule.
"Ineligible Receivers Downfield
One of the most common penalties called in regard to eligible receivers is the "ineligible receiver downfield."
This rule is in place to prevent offensive linemen from going too far downfield to block before the actual throw.
You will see this penalty called most often on screen passes to running backs, when offensive linemen "release" from their pass-blocking stance to go downfield and try to block too soon.
The rule states that an ineligible receiver can't go outside of the neutral zone before a pass is thrown.
This means offensive linemen must stay within that neutral zone and can't "release" to block downfield on a passing play until the pass is actually released from the quarterback's hand.
When an ineligible receiver downfield penalty is called, it results in the offensive team losing five yards. Whatever play actually happened will be canceled out, and the offense will repeat the down."
What is an Ineligible Receiver? (Full Explanation)
In a football game, not every player on offense is actually eligible to receive a pass. Here's how to know who can and can't receive passes.
So, what constitutes "the neutral zone" in this case? Obviously this is different than the 'neutral zone' on an off-sides call.
Did he? Seemed like most plays for him were sweeps or outside zone plays that were dead from the start. We should be running him right up the gut and then mixing in the outside stuff. I don't know why they keep trying to run outside. He does bounce things too quickly, but we're also running outside by design on his carries.
KidSilverhair
Well-Known Member
I couldn't find an exact definition of this rule.
"Ineligible Receivers Downfield
One of the most common penalties called in regard to eligible receivers is the "ineligible receiver downfield."
This rule is in place to prevent offensive linemen from going too far downfield to block before the actual throw.
You will see this penalty called most often on screen passes to running backs, when offensive linemen "release" from their pass-blocking stance to go downfield and try to block too soon.
The rule states that an ineligible receiver can't go outside of the neutral zone before a pass is thrown.
This means offensive linemen must stay within that neutral zone and can't "release" to block downfield on a passing play until the pass is actually released from the quarterback's hand.
When an ineligible receiver downfield penalty is called, it results in the offensive team losing five yards. Whatever play actually happened will be canceled out, and the offense will repeat the down."
What is an Ineligible Receiver? (Full Explanation)
In a football game, not every player on offense is actually eligible to receive a pass. Here's how to know who can and can't receive passes.
So, what constitutes "the neutral zone" in this case? Obviously this is different than the 'neutral zone' on an off-sides call.
I found some references to the neutral zone “expanding” up to three yards either side of the line of scrimmage once the ball is snapped.
Here’s the rule right out of the NCAA rule book. It refers to “three yards beyond the neutral zone,” which here means the ball-width neutral zone at the original line of scrimmage.
Also, while I understand and share the concerns about the slow offensive starts, if I was forced to choose between
a) starting hot and then blowing a lead and a game because the team fades in the second half
b) starting slow and then either extending or coming back to take a lead and then winning the game off that
I think b is the much more preferable of the two scenarios to be in. Again, it's not particularly great and may not be sustainable, but I'd much rather be a second half team than a first half team if the team wasn't at a level where they're playing four complete quarters consistently yet.
a) starting hot and then blowing a lead and a game because the team fades in the second half
b) starting slow and then either extending or coming back to take a lead and then winning the game off that
I think b is the much more preferable of the two scenarios to be in. Again, it's not particularly great and may not be sustainable, but I'd much rather be a second half team than a first half team if the team wasn't at a level where they're playing four complete quarters consistently yet.
That's interesting that you'd rather win than lose.
Had to listen to the game and am rewatching it now and that had to have been one of the worst 60 second stretches of football I’ve ever seen
ISU seemed to wear down both Iowa and Houston late.
I thought ISU started sharp on their first drive last night on offense but sputtered at the end.
Finish that, get a field goal or two before half and the mood is very different.
I like a clunky 'attention getter' type of win before Baylor comes to town for a reset.
Eh...I've seen much worse from ISU.
Heck just recently the '22 season was full of bad football including the win at Iowa.
We’re going to need depth at RB. Good to have different styles. Jackson has been impressive. He’s very quick and shifty at the line and second level. Appears Sama needs bigger holes to utilize his straight line speed. He tends to get bumped and tackled or tried to get tot he edge and teams are too quick.
