Still a lot of conference season left, but I'd be pretty surprised if the conference POY isn't one of those three.
At this time, I would say that KSUs Lee is player of the year.
Still a lot of conference season left, but I'd be pretty surprised if the conference POY isn't one of those three.
As much as this Wildcat loves Lee, I have to go with Joens as POY. Joens can make her own shot. Lee has to have an entry pass. Both play great defense and rebound well.
Maryland does go down (69-49 to Michigan) so the two teams number 7 (Maryland) and 8 (Arizona) both have losses as of late.With #7 losing and #8 teetering, I could see ISU moving up a couple of spots tomorrow.
What tv availability will there be for the women's game versus Texas on Wednesday evening?
Looking at Charlie's bracketology it's strange where he has the 2 seeds at. As of this posting he has Arizona in Bridgeport, us in Greensboro, Tennessee in Wichita and Indiana in Spokane. Would make more sense to do Indiana in Bridgeport, Tennessee in Greensboro us in Wichita and Arizona in Spokane.
It looks like he's placing the 1s in their closest region, and then sticking hard to an S-curve instead of giving the 2s any geographic consideration. It also has the effect of keeping conference opponents (South Carolina/Tennessee, Stanford/Arizona) as far apart as possible.
#1 South Carolina (1), #2 Iowa State (8)
#1 N.C. State (4), #2 Arizona (5)
--------
#1 Stanford (2), #2 Indiana (7)
#1 Louisville (3), #2 Tennessee (6)
Thanks for the info. I was just thinking with how the wbb ncaa tournament struggles with attendance getting teams closer to home would be important in seeding.
I don't think they care as much about regional attendance and just assume the #1s will carry the day.
The regionals format starting next year (2 sites of 8 teams) will create a desert in the midwest for the next 4 seasons, anyway. Tough time for a Big 12 or Big Ten team to be really good.
2023: Greenville, S.C.; Seattle
2024: Albany, Portland
2025: Birmingham, Spokane
2026: Fort Worth, Sacramento
Woof Ft. Worth is the only one a little close. So how is this regional format working? the 64 team start on home courts then once your in the 32 it is at these locations?
Instead of 4 regional sites (4x4) for the Sweet 16, it'll be 2 (2x8). Two regions will funnel to each site.
I don't think they care as much about regional attendance and just assume the #1s will carry the day.
The regionals format starting next year (2 sites of 8 teams) will create a desert in the midwest for the next 4 seasons, anyway. Tough time for a Big 12 or Big Ten team to be really good.
2023: Greenville, S.C.; Seattle
2024: Albany, Portland
2025: Birmingham, Spokane
2026: Fort Worth, Sacramento
First time hearing about this 2 site stuff. Those future locations are brutal.
If you are desperate for somewhere "west" go to Denver, Salt Lake City, heck even Phoenix, but Spokane and Portland? In all honesty, those regionals from 2023-2026 will do more to harm the women's game than grow it.