Just out of curiousity, wouldn't someone have to have a registered username in order to know this? If an unregistered person viewed the site you wouldn't be able to tell who it was.
Unless Jeremy = JP :shocked:
Just out of curiousity, wouldn't someone have to have a registered username in order to know this? If an unregistered person viewed the site you wouldn't be able to tell who it was.
Maybe Jamie is using this opportunity to pull out all the trolls on Twitter for a mass banning event.JP needs to just shut his ******* mouth. Apparently he has no grasp of public image and damage control.
Again, the guy did not tweet at JP.
What people do not understand is that when you get into a conversation on Twitter, and you use the @someones user name, they will be included on every reply in the conversation. This guy did not tweet at Jamie, the person he was in a conversation with included Jamie in the conversation (as well as Prohm), and because that person did that, Jamie and Prohm were brought into the conversation.
I don't know what else to say other than you are just wrong about this. I certainly understand Twitter. He did tweet at JP. That's what happens when your tweet has "@IASTATEAD" in it. Who cares who first added that name in the tweet? Maybe he didn't mean to tweet at JP, we don't know... But he did.
It isn't much different than if I email you, you respond by CC'ing CW, and I click reply all and say "Yeah Chuck, CW should be fired." Did I email CW or not?
Thank and praise anyone who wants to support ISU! We want and need any "bandwagon" fans we can get (obviously not the case here anyway). Just a ridiculous thing for JP to do. His ego is out of control!
No, you're sending the e-mail to me, and copying in CW. the thing with Twitter is you dont have an option to just reply to one or reply to all, it automatically replies to all.
If the guy meant to tweet at JP, he would of done it with his first tweet on the reaction to the hire. The same reason JP was included in his second response is the same reason Steve Prohm was included in on it; because the person he was interacting with included those two.
Yes the guy probably should of removed JP and Prohm, but his intention was not to talk to them directly, and that much is obvious.
The bolded is just incorrect. And someone else already posted that earlier.
Jamie is on Murph & Andy right now. Some of what he says is interesting:
"If you want to say I should be fired and that Matt's a bad hire, you're entitled to do that... [But] when you direct it right at me, I don't know why you'd be surprised when I respond."
"[We] certainly got the Hawkeye fans not talking about their 12-0 team but talking about Iowa State. We're dominating the media the last two days."
"When you tweet at me and say I should be fired, you've stepped into it."
"We want fans that don't want to be front runners. We want fans, like we've had 56,000 [at JTS], that certainly weren't front running when we won 8 games in the last 3 years."
Also comparing his use of social media to Andy Fales trolling NDSU fans, and mentions that social media moves quickly and he moved on after about 30 seconds; I think he is surprised that this tweet of his got so much attention.
Sounds a little like Trump.
I'm thinking the d in chuck d is for dan, as in killer_clone.
Stupid response by JP, but for these stupid moments I'll take it because I believe he has done more for ISU in his 10+ years than I'll ever do in my lifetime for Cyclone athletics. If you want to get rid of JP then I hope that JP pi$$es you off enough to move on.
Life's too short to worry about this whiny crap from either side.
No its not. You don't have an option to just "reply" or "reply to all". When you push "reply" it automatically includes all the names who have been included in the conversation to date. Yes, you can remove names manually, but there is no option like you have with e-mail.
Because Jamie is a Jesus guy:
Modern Jesus on twitter: "Classic. This guy (Judas) was blasting us 36 hours earlier. We do not need front runners. PLease stay off the camel!"
Let me be clear, I in NO WAY want JP gone. I've said this many times, and usually laugh at the people who want him gone. JP is by far the best thing to happen to ISU since I have been a fan. However, the football hire is very important, and if Campbell does not work out, I do think JP could be done at ISU.
Just don't admit to being a Christian here, you'll be fine.Um. Ok.
???