So you know nothing about this case, so don't talk. The girl lied. I also didn't know you knew Bubu so well personally to judge him. You remind me of one of those old people that just want to throw every kid in jail.It's a big deal because there was poor decision making on Palo's part which could have ruined his life legally (i.e. rape conviction) and otherwise (i.e. revenge of jealous boyfriend). None of this mess would have happened if these guys had just given the girl a ride home, escorted her to the door, and left. The decision to proceed to a different course of action was theirs, not hers. Why no discussion of this and the lessons learned from it? It seems like this would be an important aspect of a young man trying to rebuild his life.
Furthermore, the article, in its attempt to paint Palo as a good kid by pointing out the strong religious influence in his life leading up to these events, severely contradicts itself. If religion was a big influence in Palo's life and "ingrained" many lessons in him, where was that influence when the decision was made to proceed into the residence with the girl? There certainly seems to have been some activity that occurred which would be in conflict with Catholic religious principles.
Strictly regarding the article, IMO, it's basically just a fluff piece, doesn't really accomplish anything useful, is self-contradictory, and might even cloud matters even more. It would have been better off not written.
In conclusion, your post was horrible, and you know nothing about the case, the girl, Spencer or bubu. Next time I hear of a 3 way i'll be sure to phone the police because it clearly is morally wrong and deserves punishment by jail, and a rape conviction even if it was consensual.