Lick has said many times that he's aware this is going to be a tough season. He has said publicly that he doesn't believe this team is short on talent, but if he recognizes that the players currently on the roster are not equipped to play his sort of ball - which is take a lot of 3 point shots. I mean, look at the team, how many players can consistantly make a three pointer? Johnson? That's it.
I don't understand why after 8 games everybody thinks he's going to flop at Iowa. The team is having major growing pains, but at times they really show some great promise. For example, last night for 30 minutes of the game, they were playing some of their best basketball of the season - then they played their worst 10 minutes of the season and lost to a bad ULM team.
How is what Lick is doing any different than what Chizik is doing with the ISU football team? Everybody claims that when Mac left, their was no talent on the team, and that Chizik was working with in a very difficult situation. Yet even after bad losses and rare signs of improvement, ISU fans are optimistic after the season because of wins over CU and KSU.
I would agree that there is cause for optimism with the ISU football program, as well as the Iowa basketball program. Lick is frustrated right now, but at least he's starting to get his players to play emotional ball. I'd take a 5-9 win season without Alford and the knowledge that Lick is building a program anytime.