Shocker!!! The guy who knows more than Coach Rhoads also knows more than Coach Hoiberg. What's next, got a bone to pick with Stephen Hawking?
Opposing opinions aren't welcome? Is this lemming.com?
Shocker!!! The guy who knows more than Coach Rhoads also knows more than Coach Hoiberg. What's next, got a bone to pick with Stephen Hawking?
HB isn't a remotely fair comparison. As for Gilstrap, I'd rather have a talented 3-4 year player in a New York minute. We'll have plenty of guards when Korie is eligible. If Korie was a 'big' I might have a different attitude.
I'd take Lucious for one year on the court and one year on the practice squad over a Demarcus Phillips on the bench for two years any day!
Opposing opinions aren't welcome? Is this lemming.com?
I like it. Well known name from a big time program with tons of experience on a winning team. If nothing else it is a good recruiting tool.
He is a good guard. May not have high average numbers but he can light it up on a given night.
Pass! Id much rather have Bubu than get this guy with one year left and ALL that baggage. Hes never shot even close to 40% from the field in any of his 3 years. please hint waste a scholly on a guy like this when we could get a 2012 kid that will prob be better
They would have played right away, so you are not tying up a scholarship on a guy who is on the bench, get one year out of him, and then he is done. That is why JUCOs are more popular than trasnfers. They play right away, give your team a boost, then move on leaving a scholarship open for the next guy. There is no downtime waiting for a kid to be eligible.So, you wouldn't have wanted Marquis Gilstrap or Harrison Barnes (if he went pro after one year) on the team?
I am about done with this transfer thing. Burning a scholarship for a year so we can wait to get one year of play out of a guy just seems crazy at this point. Our team needs some reserves. the transfer situation can really be seen this year as we have no usable bench. I was hoping Fred was done doing this. We have our shot in the arm, and I would like to see future scholarships going to players who will be on scholarship for a few years and not have to wait to see the floor. I dream of having 13 eligible players competing in a game.
He was starting guard for 2 Final Four teams. He's worth at least a look as there's no certainty about future point guards will do vs. tough competition.
Shocker! The cyclone apologist comes on to bash my post. You could always offer up your own opinions, you know. That is what the forum is for. And nice Stephen Hawking comparison. A guy who is reknowned for his work, with multiple awards, being compared to two first time coaches, who only look great to us because we have such low expectations at ISU we will get excited over anything. When Rhoads is winning 7-9 games a year, and Hoiberg has back to back NCAA appearances, I will say trust the coaches. Until then I am on the skeptical bandwagon. Go ahead and be behind every decision they make, if that is your perogative.Shocker!!! The guy who knows more than Coach Rhoads also knows more than Coach Hoiberg. What's next, got a bone to pick with Stephen Hawking?
So we're officially becoming the place misfits go for second chances??
I'm all for getting better talent, but I never thought CFH would be interested in doing it this way.
BUT, that said, hopefully they have learned from their mistakes and won't be a problem here.
We would be building our scout team for next year.I am about done with this transfer thing. Burning a scholarship for a year so we can wait to get one year of play out of a guy just seems crazy at this point. Our team needs some reserves. the transfer situation can really be seen this year as we have no usable bench. I was hoping Fred was done doing this. We have our shot in the arm, and I would like to see future scholarships going to players who will be on scholarship for a few years and not have to wait to see the floor. I dream of having 13 eligible players competing in a game.