My old Sony television just bit the dust ......

zumbro clones

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2007
1,749
314
83
Southern Minnesota
The new plasma models are reasonably priced compared to the new LED models. Does anyone have experience with the new plasma TVs? I'm worried about burn-in since we watch a lot of channels that the crawlers or logos on the screen and play a lot of video games that have part of the screen that doesn't change much.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
The new plasma models are reasonably priced compared to the new LED models. Does anyone have experience with the new plasma TVs? I'm worried about burn-in since we watch a lot of channels that the crawlers or logos on the screen and play a lot of video games that have part of the screen that doesn't change much.

Do not use a plasma for a monitor.

The 120-240 HZs LCDs/LEDs/3-Ds have finally caught up to plasma although plasma may be cheaper.

For energy savings, use LCD.

Avoid 60 HZ at this point if you watch sports as the refresh rate is too slow in LCDs.
 

acoustimac

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2009
9,193
10,704
113
Lamoni, IA
Sorry Mac, I didn't take the time to look this up. Is this an LED/LCD?

I was at Travis yesterday, and they have 6-7 of these left for less than a grand ---KDL 40NX 700.
But I am sure the EX is a much better set.

Thank you.

The 700 is the "old" model. The 710 is the newer one. They are LED. Of course you could go the 3D route, but that is "cutting edge" technology that you will pay for right now. Probably better off going with the 710 and wait a few years for the 3D stuff to mature and come down in price. I wish i could tell you the diff between the 700 and 710, but would probably be worth doing the research on (don't ask a salesperson - they will say "not much diff" just to sell the old model). Good luck!
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
The 700 is the "old" model. The 710 is the newer one. They are LED. Of course you could go the 3D route, but that is "cutting edge" technology that you will pay for right now. Probably better off going with the 710 and wait a few years for the 3D stuff to mature and come down in price. I wish i could tell you the diff between the 700 and 710, but would probably be worth doing the research on (don't ask a salesperson - they will say "not much diff" just to sell the old model). Good luck!

From what I have seen is the contrast ratio has been signifcantly improved between newer models: 3,0000 to 1 slid into 20,000 to 1 became 60,000 to 1, then 120,000 to one, and even 1,000,000 to one. Here is a funny article:

CONTRAST RATIO: ARE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS IMPORTANT?


Plasmas were better at night as they had darker darks, now LCDs/LEDs have done better.
 

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,518
5,858
113
50131
The new plasma models are reasonably priced compared to the new LED models. Does anyone have experience with the new plasma TVs? I'm worried about burn-in since we watch a lot of channels that the crawlers or logos on the screen and play a lot of video games that have part of the screen that doesn't change much.

I have CNBC on for probably 3 hours a day and have left it on for 12 hours at a time and never had any burn in issues nor am I worried about it. Panasonic. If you just have this as a TV that is going to sit there all day on the same channel, that has a banner than get ans LCD. If not, don't worry about it.
 

jay moe

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
3,672
837
113
55
southern iowa
Would you buy, or have you recently purchased a new flat screen?

I believe I have "settled" on Sony, Samsung, or LG, 40 to 46 inches, LED/LCD non 3D.
Your recommendations and comments would be appreciated with regard to picture, ease of use, remote, etc.

Thanking you beforehand for your time and consideration.

GO CYCLONES :yes:
We just bought a Samsung LED 46" Ultrathin and its been great, plus we got a Blu-Ray player with it as part of the deal.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,908
12,691
113
Bought this Samsung this summer, absolutely love it. The 120hz is fun to turn on when watching sports or blu-ray. Makes things have more depth and a 3D like look. Some people don't like the look, but the auto motion plus is easy to switch off if you are one of those people. The 60hz version is a little cheaper if you do not think you would want that feature.
Really easy to use, great picture, and price went down quite a bit. I've heard from a lot of people that Samsung or Sony are the way to go.
Amazon.com: Samsung LN40C630 40-Inch 1080p 120 Hz LCD HDTV (Black): Electronics

You might confuse somebody with your description of 120 Hz and auto motion technology. They aren't one in the same and each brand is different. You must get 120 Hz or you will regret it.

Burn in for plasma is not a concern any more either.
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,785
30,207
113
Trenchtown
I got a 52NX800 for very little cost from Sony to replace my old sony SXRD that shot craps. I really like it. I think you can get them for less than $1500 now.

Your old TV that shot craps was not an SXRD or 3LED was it?
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,785
30,207
113
Trenchtown
The new plasma models are reasonably priced compared to the new LED models. Does anyone have experience with the new plasma TVs? I'm worried about burn-in since we watch a lot of channels that the crawlers or logos on the screen and play a lot of video games that have part of the screen that doesn't change much.

I have had a wii hooked up to a plasma for 3 years, no issues so far.
 

Flag Guy

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2007
12,562
369
83
I've got a 46" Samsung LCD about a year ago, and have liked it so far.

That said, I also looked at Sony and LG, and they should both work fine for you. Sony probably has a little better conectivity with other Bravia devices (Like a blu-ray player) but you can get a blu-ray player from Samsung where you press one button and it turns both the blu-ray player and the TV on and switches the TV to the right input source.

I have less experience with LG devices, but you can get more features for less money with LG and it's still good quality

I'd go LED if you have the choice. All you have to do is walk into a Best Buy and you can spot which TV's are the LED's from a distance
 

Balrog

Active Member
Sep 17, 2008
700
97
28
Des Moines
I got a 52NX800 for very little cost from Sony to replace my old sony SXRD that shot craps. I really like it. I think you can get them for less than $1500 now.

Your old TV that shot craps was not an SXRD or 3LED was it?

No sir.
It was an old 32 inch Sony tube set, "high definition" for its time, (710 I think.)
By the way, your choice for a TV was a good one.

From Consumer Reports, the highest rated plasma TV was the LG Infinia 50 PK750. It was rated an 82 for around 1100.00
The highest rated LCD/LED is the Sony Bravia KDL 52NX800. It was rated a 78 and sells for about not quite twice the money (1800.00 or so.)

Good job by you, especially if you don't want plasma.
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,785
30,207
113
Trenchtown
No sir.
It was an old 32 inch Sony tube set, "high definition" for its time, (710 I think.)
By the way, your choice for a TV was a good one.

From Consumer Reports, the highest rated plasma TV was the LG Infinia 50 PK750. It was rated an 82 for around 1100.00
The highest rated LCD/LED is the Sony Bravia KDL 52NX800. It was rated a 78 and sells for about not quite twice the money (1800.00 or so.)

Good job by you, especially if you don't want plasma.

The 52NX800 is on clearance now. I only had to pay $700 for it due to a class action lawsuit against Sony, but I know you can get it for $1100-$1200 now. Check Traviss and see what they are selling it for.
 

Balrog

Active Member
Sep 17, 2008
700
97
28
Des Moines
The 52NX800 is on clearance now. I only had to pay $700 for it due to a class action lawsuit against Sony, but I know you can get it for $1100-$1200 now. Check Traviss and see what they are selling it for.

Thanks for the update Brian.
That set, for that kind of money would be a real good buy.
It's just too big for the area in which I intend to view it.

FYI, Wes got a terrific deal on a plasma, if that is of anyones interest.

GO CYCLONES:yes:
 

Balrog

Active Member
Sep 17, 2008
700
97
28
Des Moines
Dear Fanatics,
The TV that I am seriously considering is the Samsung UN46C6900. It is an LED/LCD television that ONLY HAS AN OPTICAL OUTPUT FOR AUDIO.
I am hoping that this is not a serious drawback, resulting in another television choice.
I own a Krell KAV-300i integrated amplifier, and I was hopeful that there was a way to run the audio through it, to my stereo speakers. I know that the Krell does not have optical jacks. Am I just out of luck or is there some way to accomplish this with some kind of converter?
I can't abide the thought of the additional purchase of a receiver with an optical outlet.
Any ideas?
Otherwise I suppose it will be back to square one.

Thanks all for your time and attention.
GO CYCLONES:yes:
 
Last edited:

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,518
5,858
113
50131
What are you inputing into the TV? Directv, Dish, Mediacom, etc. What are your output options from them?
 

jbclone

New Member
Jan 16, 2009
18
0
1
As a person in the business that does sell Samsung i will say you cant go wrong with the UN46C6900. Although i would check out the UN46C6300 if you are not in to the Samsung Apps, which most of them you can get with a Blu-ray. The 6300 looks alittle different but also has a great picture. The audio is a simple fix both of these have a audio out mini jack which is a headphone jack so just need a y audio cable (headphone to red/white rca) and plug it in to an input on your reciecver.
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,785
30,207
113
Trenchtown
Dear Fanatics,
The TV that I am seriously considering is the Samsung UN46C6900. It is an LED/LCD television that ONLY HAS AN OPTICAL OUTPUT FOR AUDIO.
I am hoping that this is not a serious drawback, resulting in another television choice.
I own a Krell KAV-300i integrated amplifier, and I was hopeful that there was a way to run the audio through it, to my stereo speakers. I know that the Krell does not have optical jacks. Am I just out of luck or is there some way to accomplish this with some kind of converter?
I can't abide the thought of the additional purchase of a receiver with an optical outlet.
Any ideas?
Otherwise I'll suppose it will be back to square one.

Thanks all for your time and attention.
GO CYCLONES:yes:

That is fine, you are never going to output the audio of the TV out to anything, it is all input. I assume it has 3-4 HDMI inputs and that is all you need. Does your krell (nice unit btw) have HDMI?
 

Balrog

Active Member
Sep 17, 2008
700
97
28
Des Moines
That is fine, you are never going to output the audio of the TV out to anything, it is all input. I assume it has 3-4 HDMI inputs and that is all you need. Does your krell (nice unit btw) have HDMI?

Brian, thank you for posting.

I have been told through PM, that I can run the optical through my satellite receiver and from the satellite receiver to the amplifier without being optical.
So, I guess as long as I am not using an antennae, I will be okay. (No, no HDMI)

(And yes sir, I love the "low end" Krell integrated amp. It has been terrific. I just wish it had a phono stage, because I have an itch to get a turntable these days.)
GO CYCLONES:yes:
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron