Nah man, I was just pointing out that prohm can't get all the credit for Tyrese. Look at this thread. If prohm can't be blamed for Zion and Lewis, then he certainly can't get all the credit for Tyrese development when he wasn't even his only coach.
I don't think anyone is giving Prohm full credit for Tyrese's success and progress, because that's not fair to Tyrese. Prohm gave Tyrese the exact same opportunities as everyone else on the team. Tyrese has succeeded for a variety of reasons, whether that be God given ability, timing, effort put in the gym after practice and in the off-season, etc.
Just because you give all those opportunities, it doesn't mean everyone's going to progress to the same level or at the same time. Everyone is different. Someone could do the exact same thing as Tyrese but show no signs of progression whatsoever, and frankly that happens to SO many college players. Lots of them never get better, or even if they do, it's not drastic and it's not able to seen out on the floor during a game. And sometimes even when a player looks to have progressed, it can take a bad practice or a bad game for those guys to revert back to their ways, sort of like Conditt did this year.
Prohm is the head coach, so he should take the blame for a variety of things, even if those things seem out of his control. If Zion and Lewis couldn't figure it out and progress either skill wise or mentally, then it's on Prohm for recruiting them, but you can't predict the future. Guys don't progress all the time. This happens everywhere. Every single player on the team is not going to end up being able to play significant minutes. Zion and Lewis are being brought to light because we needed them this year to have been a good team but they weren't. Anderson and Leech's open spots hurt this team incredibly. If those could've been used on capable freshman, grad transfers, or JUCO guys, we likely wouldn't have been this bad. Those spots being opened however gave Prohm the opportunity to offer pretty good recruits for next year.