Great player.
Might be a low level D3 walk-on.
Why do male high school players(?) become practice competition in practice at the D1 level?
Because they provide a higher level of competition than their teammates can provide.
Is is that she's a woman?She'd still get killed at a D3 school. Heck she'd still be a small guard at D3.
In men's college basketball? She'd have to adapt to the ball (no idea if she ever shoots a regular one now or not), but if she could do that, sure. She can flat out shoot. Would have to find a way to hide her on defense with a zone or she'd get overpowered.
D3s don't offer scholarships smartass.Great player.
Might be a low level D3 walk-on.
Why do male high school players(?) become practice competition in practice at the D1 level?
Because they provide a higher level of competition than their teammates can provide.
She would match up well with Bowen Born...
Is is that she's a woman?
Yeah, technically ALL D-3 players are “walk ons” lolD3s don't offer scholarships smartass.
Take it to opinionsYeah, technically ALL D-3 players are “walk ons” lol
She would get owned hard by any starting guard in the B12.I'll say this...most of the responses in this thread are comparing women's BB 20 years ago to men. It used to be unwatchable, but the women's game has gotten 1000% better in the last 10-20 years. Of course, she would not be a superstar or even probably regular rotation player, but it's a lot closer than many of you think.
Penicillin?You just have to give her the WV treatment
The big differences for her would be when she drives she likes to chicken wing the other players for separation. She can do that to Lexi, now replace Lexi with Jaren and she does that, she isn’t getting any push. Now if she gets around him, she has to deal with Osun as a rim protector instead of Kane. Her drives are dead. So she would be a shooter. There is a pretty good difference when you are shooting the men’s and women’s ball. You wouldn’t think so when you say it’s an inch, but it makes a good difference. Throw in that now she has a 6-2 to a 6-5 guard on her instead of a 5-9 to 6-0 and her vision will be tougher along with a longer wingspan and more vertical. She wouldn’t be a D1 mens player.I'll say this...most of the responses in this thread are comparing women's BB 20 years ago to men. It used to be unwatchable, but the women's game has gotten 1000% better in the last 10-20 years. Of course, she would not be a superstar or even probably regular rotation player, but it's a lot closer than many of you think.
Yes. And that’s ok. Good grief, I’ll never understand some people’s needs to make everything equal.Is is that she's a woman?
I would give her d3. Some of those teams are pretty bad. It’s like HS backups at time.When I was in Jr high, the hs women's ball coach wanted our 8th grade boys to scrimmage the hs girls one practice. Our 1 guy over 6' and easily our best player was not allowed to play. Small hs, girls were a top 3 team in conference.
The girls made their first shot. 2-0. Then the ladies coach called it off after we went on a 40-0 run off of about 17 straight turnovers.
Women can compete in a lot of things with men, but not things that involve running and jumping.
She is the most exciting women's player I've ever seen (maybe next to griner), but I doubt she'd see playing time on many d3 men's teams.