Virginia Law to allow schools to pay players for NIL

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,193
29,525
113
As of July 1st, a new Virginia law makes it illegal for the NCAA to punish schools for paying athletes for name image and likeness deals.
The law attempts to draw a distinction between NIL and pay for play, by continuing to classify athletes as non-employees, but allowing the the schools to compensate them for marketing purposes.

It will be interesting to see how the NCAA and/or other states respond to this.

 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
96,835
58,076
113
53
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
As of July 1st, a new Virginia law makes it illegal for the NCAA to punish schools for paying athletes for name image and likeness deals.
The law attempts to draw a distinction between NIL and pay for play, by continuing to classify athletes as non-employees, but allowing the the schools to compensate them for marketing purposes.

It will be interesting to see how the NCAA and/or other states respond to this.

Seems like that would be very vulnerable to a lawsuit claiming that it makes them de facto employees even if it says they aren't.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,193
29,525
113
College sports done most money wins!
That's not really much of a change. When was the last time a MAC school made the CFP? Big time college sports has always favored the "haves" over the "have nots". Nobody wants competitive balance, across the board. Not really. There's no realistic scenario where the SEC wants a level playing field with the Sunbelt.

I'm sorry, but the time for crying about the rich getting richer has been over for years. Decades even.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,193
29,525
113
Seems like that would be very vulnerable to a lawsuit claiming that it makes them de facto employees even if it says they aren't.
Yeah, this doesn't feel like a law that will exist in its current state for very long. It's either going to get pummeled by the court system or superceded by another law that defines athletes as employees.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
17,582
27,797
113
It's been like that for decades. It's just more in the open now. Look at the last CFP. All four teams are in the top 25 for the highest athletic budgets. Texas, Alabama, and Michigan are in the top 5 athletic budgets.
It's the same with any new development in NIL. A group of people will throw there hands in the air and declare this is officially the death of college sports. It's been going on for years now.
 

MeowingCows

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2015
35,681
34,023
113
Iowa
It's the same with any new development in NIL. A group of people will throw there hands in the air and declare this is officially the death of college sports. It's been going on for years now.
So long as all schools are still within NCAA D1, the product on-field and coverage of it will be alright. When we finally reach the day when the superleague separates away with it's 20 or 30 chosen ones, then we'll start having real discussions on sports being ruined (for people like us).
 
  • Winner
Reactions: ClubCy

MushroomPinball

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 4, 2017
597
1,160
93
That's not really much of a change. When was the last time a MAC school made the CFP? Big time college sports has always favored the "haves" over the "have nots". Nobody wants competitive balance, across the board. Not really. There's no realistic scenario where the SEC wants a level playing field with the Sunbelt.

I'm sorry, but the time for crying about the rich getting richer has been over for years. Decades even.
Just because a problems always existed, doesn't mean it can't be getting worse.
 

CYDJ

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2013
5,643
4,626
113
56
Money always won. The illusion is done.
That's just the way it is, some things will never change..... That's just he way it is, the way it is, the way it is.....

OK, with a little less vague sarcasm this time.

NOW, that it is out in the open, that it is free market capitalism instead of blatant CHEATING, we have less to complain about. Popular things win out. People vote with their pocketbooks. Successful things create more success. The Free Market is not the answer for everything, but is it possibly the answer for college sports?

The arguments now are:

1) Do the big boys have their present competitive advantage becuase of years of cheating or not.
2) Did we start this free market experiment with a level playing field? AND
3) Should we TRY to do anything to assure something closer to parity? OR
4) Should those schools that have / can gather more money win? (i.e., is this all about money? hehe!)
 

NetflixAndClone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 6, 2015
5,241
6,289
113
The State of Hockey
"If this law gets us closer to a federal or a national solution for college athletics then it will be more than worthwhile," University of Virginia athletic director Carla Williams said. "Until then, we have an obligation to ensure we maintain an elite athletics program at UVA."
interesting line form the Virginia AD, I personally hope she is right. Hopefully this is the first dominoes that starts a reaction to work for a nationwide solution.
 

8bitnes

Well-Known Member
Nov 21, 2010
2,519
2,635
113
That's just the way it is, some things will never change..... That's just he way it is, the way it is, the way it is.....

OK, with a little less vague sarcasm this time.

NOW, that it is out in the open, that it is free market capitalism instead of blatant CHEATING, we have less to complain about. Popular things win out. People vote with their pocketbooks. Successful things create more success. The Free Market is not the answer for everything, but is it possibly the answer for college sports?

The arguments now are:

1) Do the big boys have their present competitive advantage becuase of years of cheating or not.
2) Did we start this free market experiment with a level playing field? AND
3) Should we TRY to do anything to assure something closer to parity? OR
4) Should those schools that have / can gather more money win? (i.e., is this all about money? hehe!)
It was kind of fun watching how Kansas performed in basketball this year with the under the table adidas money pipeline terminated and everyone else having above the table options. Would like to see the outcome sustained for a few years in a row.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CYDJ

madguy30

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2011
50,232
47,093
113
It was kind of fun watching how Kansas performed in basketball this year with the under the table adidas money pipeline terminated and everyone else having above the table options. Would like to see the outcome sustained for a few years in a row.

Repeating but I also think Alabama last year in football and some others are feeling the heat if their usual depth has gone to lesser programs for playing time and still really good money.

If things actually even out a bit and the big TV makers aren't there in the end of the playoffs etc., let's see them then make a hard correction with guardrails of some sort.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
9,089
10,953
113
Everywhere is going to keep pushing boundaries until there just aren't any left. Total arms race.

I suppose the sooner they get to NIL-mageddon, the sooner some kind of major step change will happen.
 

ClubCy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 8, 2023
1,272
1,851
113
NIL isn’t and won’t be the death of college sports. Transfer portal isn’t and won’t be the death of college sports.

Realignment and consolidation of conferences, power, and programs will be the death.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron