Tuesday Storm Thread

cstrunk

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2006
14,449
4,845
113
38
Longview, TX
Yep.. the live chat on kcrg.com was funny... the guy said, VERY slim chance of tornado, conditions don't favor it. now they're all calling him out on it

He was correct in saying that the conditions do not favor the development of a tornado. The shear profiles (upper level wind speeds and directions) are lacking. Having said that, they can and sometimes do form on the leading edges of squall lines (what we have now). They are much more difficult (and sometimes impossible) to predict.

This is not a tornadic type event, thus he was correct in what he said.

*There is a pretty decent couplet (area of rotation) on radar south of Waterloo at this time.
 

khess83

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 7, 2009
589
27
28
Waukee , IA
When the wind really starts blowing like this is 801 tall enough that it starts swaying? I've always wanted to know that.

Not that I have ever noticed but some coworkers believe it does. There are still 11 floors above our office so maybe at the top you would really notice it.
 

pthebutcher

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 14, 2006
272
35
28
Portland
Yep.. the live chat on kcrg.com was funny... the guy said, VERY slim chance of tornado, conditions don't favor it. now they're all calling him out on it

Honestly it sounds like people getting worked up over interesting motions on the front of the bow....radar shows no compelling evidence of a tornado. Anytime the weather service gets reports of a "funnel" they will issue a warning.....just saying...there is a lot misreporting that goes on...especially with an uneducated public weatherwise that is excitable.
 

CycloneYoda

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2009
6,091
350
83
My weather radio went off 10 minutes ago and said severe T-Storm for Johnson Co. until 5:45pm. Storm is still 45+ miles away.
 

matmann22

Active Member
Dec 31, 2007
755
34
28
Pleasant Hill
matmann22.spaces.live.com
Yep.. the live chat on kcrg.com was funny... the guy said, VERY slim chance of tornado, conditions don't favor it. now they're all calling him out on it


Forecasting has got to be one of the most confounding jobs on earth.

You can have the 'perfect' setup for Thunderstorms, and then nothing happens. Or you can have a questionable setup and a huge outbreak.

The 3 am forecast discussion from the NWS office in Des Moines suggested the Dakotas thunderstorm complex could make it here by late afternoon and cause an severe weather outbreak. However, they weren't confident enough in it and it had some long odds of coming to fruition. Sometimes long shots come through!

Not sure about bogus warnings but a big windy line of storms is probably throwing all kinds of turbulence up for the Dopplar to try and figure out.

From an east facing 11th story window in Downtown DM, I can see clouds moving at different speeds at different heights. I can certainly see why a spotter would be paying extra special attention...

Generally, the atmospheric setup right now isn't conducive to tornadoes but they can always happen. It is thought there wouldn't be enough 'wind shear' for tornadoes.
 

cstrunk

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2006
14,449
4,845
113
38
Longview, TX
I kind of wish the storm would have have waited until after dark (besides the fact that it dropped the temps) because it seems like there would be some sweet lightning on the backside of the storm to take pics of....
 

pthebutcher

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 14, 2006
272
35
28
Portland
My weather radio went off 10 minutes ago and said severe T-Storm for Johnson Co. until 5:45pm. Storm is still 45+ miles away.

DVN is doing a good job actually giving warnings in advance. Although they are drawing them county based instead of storm based which they aren't supposed to do anymore.
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,537
11,931
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
Lol, this storm has been going since early this morning in SD....

I am by no means an expert, but it seemed to be heading towards the Twin Cities area as one large mass, than split into two and just about dissipated before reforming in north central Iowa. I saw the images around 11 this morning, and was not concerned at all.
 
Last edited:

huntt26

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,603
2,255
113
po' dUnk
Forecasting has got to be one of the most confounding jobs on earth.

You can have the 'perfect' setup for Thunderstorms, and then nothing happens. Or you can have a questionable setup and a huge outbreak.

The 3 am forecast discussion from the NWS office in Des Moines suggested the Dakotas thunderstorm complex could make it here by late afternoon and cause an severe weather outbreak. However, they weren't confident enough in it and it had some long odds of coming to fruition. Sometimes long shots come through!

Not sure about bogus warnings but a big windy line of storms is probably throwing all kinds of turbulence up for the Dopplar to try and figure out.

From an east facing 11th story window in Downtown DM, I can see clouds moving at different speeds at different heights. I can certainly see why a spotter would be paying extra special attention...

Generally, the atmospheric setup right now isn't conducive to tornadoes but they can always happen. It is thought there wouldn't be enough 'wind shear' for tornadoes.

Very good read, you know what you're talking about. I found it funny that the guy said no way, then boom. It's always in the best interest of the guy to just say, yes, it can happen, we'll watch it.
 

San Francisco Cy

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2008
2,978
154
63
San Francisco
So any of you weather people notice the AWFUL job the weather service is doing with their warnings right now? Late warnings, questionable warning boxes, these phantom tornado warnings. sigh

What I found interesting is that I turned on Channel 8 (the Iowa Channel), expecting to see at least a half screen or a full weather studio. Only to find just words scrolling on the bottom. I guess it's ok to interrupt basketball games and prime time. But, don't mess with Oprah!
 

iowajazz

Member
Nov 25, 2006
261
8
18
Johnston, IA
What I found interesting is that I turned on Channel 8 (the Iowa Channel), expecting to see at least a half screen or a full weather studio. Only to find just words scrolling on the bottom. I guess it's ok to interrupt basketball games and prime time. But, don't mess with Oprah!

Actually, KCCI was in weather coverage for quite a while, but WHO was not. KCCI just went back to Oprah about 4:40 (which has an all male audience today for some reason).

The storm has seemed to lose some steam now that it hit the Metro.
 

Cyclonestate78

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2008
12,115
646
113
What I found interesting is that I turned on Channel 8 (the Iowa Channel), expecting to see at least a half screen or a full weather studio. Only to find just words scrolling on the bottom. I guess it's ok to interrupt basketball games and prime time. But, don't mess with Oprah!

Are you kidding? Would you want 500 lbs of pissed off Oprah going hawk fan on you? :confused:
 
Last edited:

San Francisco Cy

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2008
2,978
154
63
San Francisco
Actually, KCCI was in weather coverage for quite a while, but WHO was not. KCCI just went back to Oprah about 4:40 (which has an all male audience today for some reason).

The storm has seemed to lose some steam now that it hit the Metro.

I actually turned it on around 4:10 or 4:15, and there was some Doctor on there. I hit the info key to find out it was Oprah. But, it was on pretty much the entire time, until the satellite went out...
 

matmann22

Active Member
Dec 31, 2007
755
34
28
Pleasant Hill
matmann22.spaces.live.com
I am by no means an expert, but it seemed to be heading towards the Twin Cities area as one large mass, than split into two and just about dissipated before reforming in north central Iowa. I saw the images around 11 this morning, and was not concerned at all.

This start off in the Dakotas and struggled to get South of a Norfolk, NE to Denison, Iowa line. Then the complex developed an 'outflow boundary' that moved south and east. This is what fired all the stroms from Ankeny back West along the I-80 corridor.

The airmass in Central Iowa was very unstable (given mid 90s and upper 70s dew point) but lacked a trigger to get the storms developing vertically. This is what the outflow boundary did.

One of the weather questions was if the outflow boundary was strong enough to develop something. Given the strong heating, whatever 'inhibition' there was was overcome by 3 pm this afternoon. Another factor could have been 'cold pools' aloft that were left by the isolated daybreak storms in Central Iowa.

I would expect a repeat performance tomorrow if we again see the mid 90s.




** An 'outflow boundary' is the cold wind flowing out and ahead of a thunderstorm (if a storm is moving at 30 mph but has winds of 50 mph, the winds are going to race out ahead of the actual storm)
 

isuno1fan

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
23,299
4,699
113
Clive, Iowa
There was ZERO reason to blow the siren in Clive. Ch. 8 pretty much mocked them for doing so as the radar showed nothing close to a tornado.

This is the reason people don't listen when the sirens go off because they blow them whenever the skies get dark.
 

Ms3r4ISU

Me: Mea culpa. Also me: Sine cura sis.
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 7, 2008
12,828
8,400
113
Ames
There was ZERO reason to blow the siren in Clive. Ch. 8 pretty much mocked them for doing so as the radar showed nothing close to a tornado.

This is the reason people don't listen when the sirens go off because they blow them whenever the skies get dark.

And not to highjack this thread, but that's why tornado sirens won't be used at ISU FB games. (The boy who cried wolf...)
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron