Is it just me or have we lost our marbles this year in play calling? A few calls stand out in this game:
Down 14 and we have the ball on the OU 45 and it's 3rd and 4 and we decide to punt when our defense was getting shredded like swiss cheese. Why not go for it and try to gain some momentum?
We stop OU on a big 4th and 1. We do the zone read, an option, a slant, and go 3 and out. All momentum lost. I know CW did not like that series. Why not throw a deep ball to Lazard or a pump and go like we saw in the 2nd half to Montgomery?
1:30 or so left in the first half. Do we try and get some points or pack it in and kick off to OU to start the 2nd half? Seems like we choose the latter as we run a QB draw, aren't in any rush, and don't take a timeout. Then we have a couple of nice plays, but by the time we get to field goal range, the clock runs out.
I know Mangino is calling the plays and has control, but can't Rhoads get involved in some of these situations? Frustrating.
Down 14 and we have the ball on the OU 45 and it's 3rd and 4 and we decide to punt when our defense was getting shredded like swiss cheese. Why not go for it and try to gain some momentum?
We stop OU on a big 4th and 1. We do the zone read, an option, a slant, and go 3 and out. All momentum lost. I know CW did not like that series. Why not throw a deep ball to Lazard or a pump and go like we saw in the 2nd half to Montgomery?
1:30 or so left in the first half. Do we try and get some points or pack it in and kick off to OU to start the 2nd half? Seems like we choose the latter as we run a QB draw, aren't in any rush, and don't take a timeout. Then we have a couple of nice plays, but by the time we get to field goal range, the clock runs out.
I know Mangino is calling the plays and has control, but can't Rhoads get involved in some of these situations? Frustrating.