You can make math and stats produce any value or answer you want it to. When humans define what math they use (as is the case with BPI, RPI, Sagarin, etc...), it is an inherently flawed decision to blindly trust it as "unbiased". Deciding what stats and weights do and do not make it "accurate" is a decision in bias and opinion, which makes it not much different than the eye test of AP voters. Kentucky is #5 in the BPI. That's ridiculous. Does anyone on this planet (outside of BBN) think Kentucky is the fifth best college basketball team this year? NO.LOL. Who needs math, it confusing. amirite?