Steve Prohm returns as head coach at Murray State

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,411
31,702
113
3 in 2004 (won two first round games)
3 in 2005 (won two first round games)
4 in 2006 (Bradley and Wichita in the Sweet 16)
3 in 2007 (won two first round games, SIU to Sweet 16)

Yep That's what I had in my head. That was a fun run of Valley hoops.
 

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,565
19,519
113
Agreed. I actually think the Valley came out ahead as I'm not sold on Loyola's long term success.

Keeps the Valley firmly into the tier with the Mountain West, A10, WCC and new AAC.

the valley is a one bid league.

those other leagues are multi-bid leagues.

I know last year was an anomaly with drake getting an at large but 90% of the time the MV is a one bid league
 

8bitnes

Well-Known Member
Nov 21, 2010
2,755
2,954
113
Next Year, along with Belmont and University of Illinios/Chicago. MVC wanted to keep the Chicago market. The two teams from OVC are nice compliments and existing rivals. I can see Belmont also competing right away. I remember when MVC regularly got move then 1 bid, (4 bids one year I think?) but its been 1 bid for a while, I think these additions and with Drake and UNI getting better we could see multiple bids again.
Losing Wichita state had a big impact on their at large profile at the time
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Acylum

swiacy

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2009
2,177
1,986
113
Prohm was a nice guy, did it the right way and his program, himself and his players represented ISU well. But his record speaks for itself. For whatever reasons he failed at the P5 level. Leo D said "nice guys finish last" which in the real world means the only thing that matters is winning. Steve didn't win at this level and did at the MId-Major level. We will see how this works out. For reference: How's Fred doing?
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,835
64,851
113
LA LA Land
Next Year, along with Belmont and University of Illinios/Chicago. MVC wanted to keep the Chicago market. The two teams from OVC are nice compliments and existing rivals. I can see Belmont also competing right away. I remember when MVC regularly got move then 1 bid, (4 bids one year I think?) but its been 1 bid for a while, I think these additions and with Drake and UNI getting better we could see multiple bids again.

I was posting in another thread that since DePaul seems to just perpetually not break through there is definitely a huge opportunity for a mid major program in Chicago whether it's Loyola or somebody else.

I think UIC has always been a bit of a high potential sleeper program not that different than how NIU has always seemed to win very easily in MAC football.

It's not like they even need to sign the second or third tier kids in the city. When I lived in Chicago I would marvel at some of the local hs talent both mens and womens. Credit Prohm for pulling THT out of that talent pool.
 

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
18,518
9,335
113
Grimes, IA
Chiz is the only ex coach who can go **** himself. Not that I wanted him to stay but I never remotely liked the guy to begin with. I have a feeling I would not have liked the program we’d have become if he stayed longer.

Almost all the others seem like great guys. CPR especially I always liked as a guy and think he did some real things here.

I completely agree with you. Chiz is the one guy I was actually glad left us as the 2 years he was here I felt his teams showed no discipline on the field like they were poorly coached. You saw what CPR did with his talent in year 1 both on the field and the change in culture which was proof Chiz was just not that good of a head coach. I never felt that he genuinely wanted to be here and leaving for Auburn without hesitation just proved that.

Nearly every coach besides him that Pollard has hired I felt wanted to stay at ISU and succeed and that includes Fred to some extent too. I have no doubt TJ is here for the long haul as long as he keeps building this and sustains success. I feel that Campbell would have left by now if he didn't want to see this through as he's had plenty of opportunities to go. CPR, McDermott, and Prohm all guys who I felt that would not use ISU as a stepping stone to a bigger job if they had success here and genuinely wanted to be here too.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,309
12,165
113
How would you classify Fran at Iowa? LOL, he's been a mix of success and failure there is maybe the best way to put it and he's not a very likable guy to boot yet Barta still extended his contract yet again... I know it's a bit off topic for this thread but he's an interesting situation given the criteria you laid out there.

I'm not a fan of the binary "success" or "failure" choice, because it's such a moving target based on a school's history or the situation a coach walks into - like cleaning up a dumpster fire like Fran did, or inheriting a winner like Prohm did. And if you're a "success" for 10, 15, 20 years and then start losing or bring down huge NCAA sanctions on your program and leave on bad terms, were you a "failure?"

But for all the deserved ridicule he gets, I think you'd have to consider Fran mostly successful. Rebuilt a moribund program, recruits well enough (especially in Iowa), wins enough games, gets to the NCAA tournament fairly regularly, seems to have the program on solid footing. His public persona isn't that likeable but bullying the media is par for the course at the U of I...he seems to be better liked internally than externally.

But here's where the moving target comes in. By Iowa standards of the 2000s, Fran is a smashing success. But he's also now a victim of his own success because their standards have changed, and by those standards he's underachieving.

Iowa is a badly mismanaged athletic department that has enough money to buy its way out of its mistakes, and if Fran can't take them to the next level sometime soon they may have to buy him out, if only to keep interest in the program from waning.
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,411
31,702
113
Losing Wichita state had a big impact on their at large profile at the time

Even with adding Murray and Belmont most years the Valley will be a one bid league. The bottom half of the league really drags the numbers down and with the emergence of all the extra holiday tournaments teams aren't looking for quality games against Valley type conferences anymore.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,835
64,851
113
LA LA Land
the valley is a one bid league.

those other leagues are multi-bid leagues.

I know last year was an anomaly with drake getting an at large but 90% of the time the MV is a one bid league

WCC can easily become a one bid year too if St Mary's has a down year. BYU has been their 2nd or 3rd best on average this decade they have been playing there. That's a really big loss.

Agree it's stronger than current MVC, but after losing BYU the gap won't be huge. It's not a deep conference at all.

Picking Gonzaga to lose to Arkansas wasn't that difficult. They get treated with the all the same hype and worship as Duke but play a schedule that is much more like Northern Iowa's.
 

Jkclone15

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2017
779
1,178
93
33
I wish him well, but as others have said if he doesn't get superior talent than his peers I don't think he has the X's and O's ability to overcome that. We'll see - Murray is one of the best mid-major jobs out there.

The B12 is loaded with hall of Fame coaches. It's not an understatement to say 90% of college coaches are worse at X's and O's than your average B12 coach. Prohm won't be at as much of a disadvantage in the valley.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyclonesRock

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
18,518
9,335
113
Grimes, IA
I'm not a fan of the binary "success" or "failure" choice, because it's such a moving target based on a school's history or the situation a coach walks into - like cleaning up a dumpster fire like Fran did, or inheriting a winner like Prohm did. And if you're a "success" for 10, 15, 20 years and then start losing or bring down huge NCAA sanctions on your program and leave on bad terms, were you a "failure?"

But for all the deserved ridicule he gets, I think you'd have to consider Fran mostly successful. Rebuilt a moribund program, recruits well enough (especially in Iowa), wins enough games, gets to the NCAA tournament fairly regularly, seems to have the program on solid footing. His public persona isn't that likeable but bullying the media is par for the course at the U of I...he seems to be better liked internally than externally.

But here's where the moving target comes in. By Iowa standards of the 2000s, Fran is a smashing success. But he's also now a victim of his own success because their standards have changed, and by those standards he's underachieving.

Iowa is a badly mismanaged athletic department that has enough money to buy its way out of its mistakes, and if Fran can't take them to the next level sometime soon they may have to buy him out, if only to keep interest in the program from waning.

Good explanation. Someone that just came to mind as a decent comparison is maybe he's Iowa's version of Dan McCarney but without the likable personality of Dan. Took over a mess, built it up to have some success then just plateaued and can't take it to the level fans have expectations for now. That sounds like Dan to a T as we had those 2 years we peaked and could not win the last game to get to win the Big 12 North. Fran took over a mess from Lickliter that took time to build back and then has flirted with success but never won the big games to take it to the level fans want to see it at.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Trice

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
18,518
9,335
113
Grimes, IA
In 10 years of coaching, Prohm is 4-3 in the NCAA tournament, .618 winning % along with 5 combined conference titles. Another coach in 28 years of coaching is 6-9 in the NCAA tournament with .599 winning % and 8 combined conference titles.

One has a Sweet 16 appearance while the other doesn't either
 

Irish1

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2016
295
638
93
56
I just wasn't ever convinced Prohm was as nice a guy as everyone keeps saying. He seemed extremely inconsistent in his "teaching character" and Yada Yada.

TJ says someone doesn't fit in with what his program wants to stand for, and he means it. Prohm's answers were vague and his actions didn't match.

I understand by this time he was desperate and under the gun, but it made me sick to my stomach the time he left Haliburton playing with one arm. And at the press conference after the game he said he didn't think it was the right choice, but Haliburton WANTED to stay in. Haliburton was only 19 years old, he could have done damage to his arm that affected his future. I lost a lot of respect.

My money says he can't build a program.
 

megamanxzero35

Well-Known Member
May 31, 2011
2,528
725
113
WCC can easily become a one bid year too if St Mary's has a down year. BYU has been their 2nd or 3rd best on average this decade they have been playing there. That's a really big loss.

Agree it's stronger than current MVC, but after losing BYU the gap won't be huge. It's not a deep conference at all.

Picking Gonzaga to lose to Arkansas wasn't that difficult. They get treated with the all the same hype and worship as Duke but play a schedule that is much more like Northern Iowa's.
This is such a wild take. Gonzaga has been in the tournament every year since 1999. 12 Sweet 16s. 5 Elite 8s. 2 Final Fours. 2 Championship games. They get one and done talent now. They get multi year starter P6 talent. They get some of the top transfers now. They were like the premier mid major school up until 2015 when they rose up and have been one of the best teams in the country since.

I would trade our last 20 years for theirs in a heartbeat. And so would just about every team in the country except the blue bloods and even then I bet some would, like Indiana.