3 in 2004 (won two first round games)
3 in 2005 (won two first round games)
4 in 2006 (Bradley and Wichita in the Sweet 16)
3 in 2007 (won two first round games, SIU to Sweet 16)
Yep That's what I had in my head. That was a fun run of Valley hoops.
3 in 2004 (won two first round games)
3 in 2005 (won two first round games)
4 in 2006 (Bradley and Wichita in the Sweet 16)
3 in 2007 (won two first round games, SIU to Sweet 16)
Agreed. I actually think the Valley came out ahead as I'm not sold on Loyola's long term success.
Keeps the Valley firmly into the tier with the Mountain West, A10, WCC and new AAC.
Losing Wichita state had a big impact on their at large profile at the timeNext Year, along with Belmont and University of Illinios/Chicago. MVC wanted to keep the Chicago market. The two teams from OVC are nice compliments and existing rivals. I can see Belmont also competing right away. I remember when MVC regularly got move then 1 bid, (4 bids one year I think?) but its been 1 bid for a while, I think these additions and with Drake and UNI getting better we could see multiple bids again.
Next Year, along with Belmont and University of Illinios/Chicago. MVC wanted to keep the Chicago market. The two teams from OVC are nice compliments and existing rivals. I can see Belmont also competing right away. I remember when MVC regularly got move then 1 bid, (4 bids one year I think?) but its been 1 bid for a while, I think these additions and with Drake and UNI getting better we could see multiple bids again.
I am so thankful that he’s a bad coach but not bad enough to fire.
Chiz is the only ex coach who can go **** himself. Not that I wanted him to stay but I never remotely liked the guy to begin with. I have a feeling I would not have liked the program we’d have become if he stayed longer.
Almost all the others seem like great guys. CPR especially I always liked as a guy and think he did some real things here.
How would you classify Fran at Iowa? LOL, he's been a mix of success and failure there is maybe the best way to put it and he's not a very likable guy to boot yet Barta still extended his contract yet again... I know it's a bit off topic for this thread but he's an interesting situation given the criteria you laid out there.
Caring about a good human being is bad?people really care about prohm around here
Losing Wichita state had a big impact on their at large profile at the time
the valley is a one bid league.
those other leagues are multi-bid leagues.
I know last year was an anomaly with drake getting an at large but 90% of the time the MV is a one bid league
I wish him well, but as others have said if he doesn't get superior talent than his peers I don't think he has the X's and O's ability to overcome that. We'll see - Murray is one of the best mid-major jobs out there.
I'm not a fan of the binary "success" or "failure" choice, because it's such a moving target based on a school's history or the situation a coach walks into - like cleaning up a dumpster fire like Fran did, or inheriting a winner like Prohm did. And if you're a "success" for 10, 15, 20 years and then start losing or bring down huge NCAA sanctions on your program and leave on bad terms, were you a "failure?"
But for all the deserved ridicule he gets, I think you'd have to consider Fran mostly successful. Rebuilt a moribund program, recruits well enough (especially in Iowa), wins enough games, gets to the NCAA tournament fairly regularly, seems to have the program on solid footing. His public persona isn't that likeable but bullying the media is par for the course at the U of I...he seems to be better liked internally than externally.
But here's where the moving target comes in. By Iowa standards of the 2000s, Fran is a smashing success. But he's also now a victim of his own success because their standards have changed, and by those standards he's underachieving.
Iowa is a badly mismanaged athletic department that has enough money to buy its way out of its mistakes, and if Fran can't take them to the next level sometime soon they may have to buy him out, if only to keep interest in the program from waning.
In 10 years of coaching, Prohm is 4-3 in the NCAA tournament, .618 winning % along with 5 combined conference titles. Another coach in 28 years of coaching is 6-9 in the NCAA tournament with .599 winning % and 8 combined conference titles.
This is such a wild take. Gonzaga has been in the tournament every year since 1999. 12 Sweet 16s. 5 Elite 8s. 2 Final Fours. 2 Championship games. They get one and done talent now. They get multi year starter P6 talent. They get some of the top transfers now. They were like the premier mid major school up until 2015 when they rose up and have been one of the best teams in the country since.WCC can easily become a one bid year too if St Mary's has a down year. BYU has been their 2nd or 3rd best on average this decade they have been playing there. That's a really big loss.
Agree it's stronger than current MVC, but after losing BYU the gap won't be huge. It's not a deep conference at all.
Picking Gonzaga to lose to Arkansas wasn't that difficult. They get treated with the all the same hype and worship as Duke but play a schedule that is much more like Northern Iowa's.