Step Back Jumpers

isucyfan

Speechless
Apr 21, 2006
21,363
5,624
113
52
Saint Paul, MN
So, I love the step back jumper move. It creates enough space to get off a shot even when closely guarded. But, as I watch college basketball around the country, it seems that those shots rarely go in. THT has shot a ton of them, and I don't remember him making many at all. Sure, James Harden makes a living at it, but is it a good shot in college?

Am I wrong that this is a low percentage shot? Or am I showing my age, and really just shouting, "Get off my lawn?" Any metrics out there about this? Have I asked enough questions in this post?
 

pulse

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
9,420
2,650
113
It’s simple, it depends who’s shooting them.
 

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
So, I love the step back jumper move. It creates enough space to get off a shot even when closely guarded. But, as I watch college basketball around the country, it seems that those shots rarely go in. THT has shot a ton of them, and I don't remember him making many at all. Sure, James Harden makes a living at it, but is it a good shot in college?

Am I wrong that this is a low percentage shot? Or am I showing my age, and really just shouting, "Get off my lawn?" Any metrics out there about this? Have I asked enough questions in this post?

It’s a shot you go to when the defense is good and the shot clock is low. There are times when the ability to get off a 35% shot is a good thing. It’s not a great shot, but it’s a skill that gives you the ability to win bad possessions.
 

isucyfan

Speechless
Apr 21, 2006
21,363
5,624
113
52
Saint Paul, MN
That's a good way to think of it. I guess I would rather see two dribbles toward the basket and a shot going into the defender in a low shot clock scenario. Chance of getting fouled there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chitowncy and Doc

Doc

This is it Morty
Aug 6, 2006
37,437
21,963
113
Denver
That's a good way to think of it. I guess I would rather see two dribbles toward the basket and a shot going into the defender in a low shot clock scenario. Chance of getting fouled there.

Yeah, but bigs have gotten so good at not fouling on foolish drives (Lard excepted) that you don’t get fouls anymore. The game has changed drastically because of D’antoni and Golden State and a lot of the things we thought we knew have changed.
 

isucyfan

Speechless
Apr 21, 2006
21,363
5,624
113
52
Saint Paul, MN
It seems like the drive option gives you a shorter shot, plus a foul chance (however small that is) as opposed to a longer shot with less of a foul chance. You can make the argument that the shot is more open, though.

With all of the metrics tracked these days, I would love to see the numbers on this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tornado man and Doc

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,264
55,155
113
It's bad when the shooter has spent 10 seconds dribbling around for no reason before forcing the shot while 4 guys are running around for no reason too.

Any shot in rhythm of some sort is going to be better for general success.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Knownothing

Prone2Clone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
10,814
10,663
113
You probably don't like quarterbacks throwing off their back foot, either. :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

isucyfan

Speechless
Apr 21, 2006
21,363
5,624
113
52
Saint Paul, MN
Obviously. They should take a couple of steps forward to increase the chance of contact to try and get to the foul line. Football 101.:)
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,131
7,731
113
Dubuque
I have less of an issue with the step back jumper than fade away jumper. It seems to me a guy with a good step back has his body under control and he still bounces up vertically.

I would agree with some of the discussion that people tend to look at analytics in isolation- especially the effective shooting % and criticism of long 2's.

I would love to see shooting % from whether it be 3 pt, long 2, 15 ft or in paint netted by what happens after the miss. For example, do missed long 3's result in more run out baskets.

Also I would be curious if foul shots are included in the 2 or 3 point shooting % to come up with an effective shooting %.
 

Knownothing

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2006
16,649
8,718
113
51
THT just dies it when it’s not needed . It’s a nice play near the end of the shot clock but we can pass it and get better shots
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,201
3,519
113
Omaha, NE
This teams habit of shooting those and long jumpers one step inside the 3 point line make me crazy. That is pickup ball **** and low % options and we do it all the time. It’s one thing if the shot clock is low but this is often with half the time still open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY and isucyfan

I-stateTheTruth

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2016
8,869
14,235
113
The step back is definitely a lower percentage shot that an uncontested shot because to your eye, the basket is moving when you do it. But it's effective in creating space so that you're not as tightly guarded. Kids practice it a lot now and with enough reps, they can get the shooting percentage up for these. It didn't exist for my generation and I wouldn't even know how to teach it.

I think THT does them quite a bit and you could argue that it's not always needed. If and when he gets that shot under control, it will be a great weapon for him. He seems like he's close to "perfecting" the shot.