Smart TV or Chromecast

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,487
5,822
113
50131
I think I have about 5 different ways to connect to apps like Neflix, Amazon, etc. Chromecast, Chormecast built into TV, Smart apps on Vizio, Blu-Ray player, PS3.

Chromecast is usually what I choose because I'll be watching a youtube video or something and then just hit the chromecast button to send it to one of my TV's.
 

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,487
5,822
113
50131
OK, I have a Vizio and they are not know for having great apps on their TV's but look how easy it is to go to something on Amazon, Netflix, etc. I did a short video.

[video=youtube;E3dYdzjSnXQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3dYdzjSnXQ[/video]
 

Skyh13

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2006
7,382
4,242
113
I'm looking to buy a 55" for our living room. It'd be our main TV. We watch Netflix and sports. Should we buy a Smart TV or a non-smart with the chromecast? And why?

There's a few things to consider.. for the most part, it comes down to personal preference vs which one is "better" than the other.

Firstly, you will likely get the same functionality out of a non-smart TV with a Chromecast as a smart TV, but the non-smart will likely be more than $35 cheaper (the cost of a Chromecast) than a comparable smart TV.

Another major point of difference is that a Smart TV will allow you to use a remote control. Chromecast doesn't have any sort of "interface" -- i.e., you don't select the Netflix App on the TV if you're using a Chromecast. You use your phone or tablet (or computer for that matter) to tell the Chromecast what to play. From personal experience, it works fairly smoothly, but if you're someone who has no desire to get our their phone or tablet in order to stream something on the TV, the Chromecast may feel cumbersome.

A third thing to consider is that, with a removable item like the Chromecast, you can reasonably upgrade it. Although Google only has two iterations of the Chromecast so far, if they release a new one in a year or two, you can buy a new one and experience the benefits without having to buy an entire new TV. This point goes for any attachable streaming device vs. a Smart TV, however. This is a major point of preference towards a streaming device for me, personally, although that doesn't mean the opposite is wrong.

And finally, the Chromecast will have wider access to streaming services than a Smart TV. Now you said you just watch sports and Netflix, so you will likely not have any issues. However, if a year from now some new streaming service comes out which adds access to certain sporting events (lets say individual teams start offering their own apps, or the Big XII comes out with a TV network), chances are that service will be available much sooner on the Chromecast vs on a Smart TV. This is because Chromecast is more ubiquitous at this point, and making it available on Chromecast will reach more people with less effort vs coding a special app for one specific Smart TV platform.

So, in short:

Smart TV Pros:
- Has a visual interface, more like Normal TV watching / using a DVR
- With visual interface, supports use of a remote rather than phone/tablet (con?)
- Fully integrated, doesn't need an extra device

Smart TV Cons:
- More expensive for same functionality
- Not easily upgradeable
- Fewer streaming services available, slower to get access to new services

Chromecast Pros:
- Access to more streaming services
- Inexpensive
- Easily upgradeable
- Has same or better functionality compared to Smart TV

Chromecast Cons:
- No user interface, could be unintuitive
- Requires phone, tablet, or computer to control


One final note -- if the two Chromecast cons that I listed are deal breakers, I'd recommend you check out the Roku Streaming Stick. You get the pro's of the Chromecast in a cheaper, upgradeable separate device which has access to lots of streaming services (since it was one of the first widely used streaming devices), while still getting a user interface with a remote which looks more like a Smart TV interface.
 

AdamJGray

Administrator
Mar 9, 2011
2,961
1,081
113
39
OK, I have a Vizio and they are not know for having great apps on their TV's but look how easy it is to go to something on Amazon, Netflix, etc. I did a short video.

[video=youtube;E3dYdzjSnXQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3dYdzjSnXQ[/video]

I see you are big on Love Actually. Respect.
 

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
63,106
61,627
113
Ames
OK, I have a Vizio and they are not know for having great apps on their TV's but look how easy it is to go to something on Amazon, Netflix, etc. I did a short video.

[video=youtube;E3dYdzjSnXQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3dYdzjSnXQ[/video]
Dude, why'd you stop? I wanted to watch The Transporter.
 

CYvilEng

Member
Aug 20, 2012
456
8
18
Des Moines
I won't elaborate on pro's or con's of everything since it's already been covered. I have a smart tv from 2008 that is starting to lose streaming functionality as time progresses. I still say pick the TV with the picture quality you want in your budget. It might be a smart tv or it might not. If the Netflix app on your TV quits working it's not like the whole tv is worthless. It's still a functioning tv.

I have a chrome cast, roku 3, and just got a fire tv. I got the amazon box so we can use the new Playstation vue streaming tv service. I really like it. I'd say the fire tv is my favorite streaming device so far only a few days in. I like having a physical remote but it also has a phone app (same with the roku).
 

mywayorcyway

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2012
2,330
2,355
113
Phoenix
I won't elaborate on pro's or con's of everything since it's already been covered. I have a smart tv from 2008 that is starting to lose streaming functionality as time progresses. I still say pick the TV with the picture quality you want in your budget. It might be a smart tv or it might not. If the Netflix app on your TV quits working it's not like the whole tv is worthless. It's still a functioning tv.

I think this is really the only reasonable way to look at it unless you're very, very picky. You can always update or change a streaming device. When I bought my last TV I barely took Smart functionality into account.

Buy a good TV, don't sweat the Smart aspect of it.
 

00clone

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2011
19,661
604
113
Iowa City area
Not to throw another angle into it, but if you do a lot of streaming from websites, a Small form factor PC, or stick computer might be another option. When we dropped cable, I got a couple Chromeboxes for streaming games. Got a mini bluetooth keyboard, and it works great. They now have chromebit, which is just a stick version of the chromebox, and intel has a computestick as well.
 

Boxerdaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,270
1,329
113
47
Beaverdale, IA
So instead of Chromecast or Roku...consider the Amazon fire tv. Currently the only add on platform that will let you get the Sony Playstation Vue*. If you're considering cutting the cord...Vue is awesome. I did pony up for the Fire TV (not the stick). Has 4k (don't have a 4k TV though...yet) Otherwise you can get the firestick for $40 i think? Just something else to consider if you want to get away from "cable". If you have a playstation you won't need any of them though.

https://www.playstation.com/en-us/network/vue/#1


*EDIT:I should clarify...if you have an iphone, i think you can use a chromecast to get VUE as well.
 
Last edited:

flynnhicks03

CF's Resident Bad Boy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
3,410
2,968
113
www.mapcon.com
So instead of Chromecast or Roku...consider the Amazon fire tv. Currently the only add on platform that will let you get the Sony Playstation Vue*. If you're considering cutting the cord...Vue is awesome. I did pony up for the Fire TV (not the stick). Has 4k (don't have a 4k TV though...yet) Otherwise you can get the firestick for $40 i think? Just something else to consider if you want to get away from "cable". If you have a playstation you won't need any of them though.

https://www.playstation.com/en-us/network/vue/#1


*EDIT:I should clarify...if you have an iphone, i think you can use a chromecast to get VUE as well.

I have a Chromecast and a FireStick. The only thing I use the Chromecast for is when there is a game on Cyclones.tv. I use the Firestick quite a bit for Amazon Prime video and TV apps like FXNow.
 

Jordanj6502

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,096
81
48
Ames
I know Chromecast can support HTML5 videos from basically any website. So if you stream videos from sites that may not have an App or Channel (like steaming sports or other less legitimate TV show sources.), Chromecast can work for that.
 

Triggermv

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
7,943
4,342
113
40
Marion, IA
Surprised there hasn't been more talk about an AppleTV, which is what I have.

Positives: has its own remote, super easy to use user interface, works super well for people with other Apple products by just logging onto Apple account, has the Airplay option where you can send anything you are watching on your Iphone or Ipad to the TV (I use this a lot, especially with Cyclones.tv), has very few bugs, small attractive looking box

Negatives: More expensive than these other options, is a bit more limited in apps vs Roku, doesn't work with Droid products
 
Last edited:

mywayorcyway

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2012
2,330
2,355
113
Phoenix
I have a Chromecast and a FireStick. The only thing I use the Chromecast for is when there is a game on Cyclones.tv. I use the Firestick quite a bit for Amazon Prime video and TV apps like FXNow.

Ha! Cyclones.TV is the only reason I bought a Chromecast. I someday expect to see actual flames coming out of the fan vent on my tiny laptop when I'm streaming with it.
 

MNCyGuy

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2009
11,645
551
83
Des Moines
I got a Chromecast as a gift and I'm really glad I didn't pay much for it, because I've had a lot of lag and buffering issues with it that I haven't when using the Netflix app that came on my older smart TV. To be fair though, most of the time I've tried using the Chromecast was with the WatchESPN app which kind of just sucks in general.
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,313
7,031
113
I'm honestly shocked that this question keeps coming up. Can the OP provide a link to what TVs he is looking at that are not smart TVs? At this point, any TV with a decent picture and features will have smart features as well, and this has been the case for a couple years now. So this really should not be a discussion.

I went on Amazon and looked at 55" TVs, 2015 or 2016 models, from Samsung, LG, Vizio, Sharp, and Sony. Out of the 45 options the search returned, there were 2 bottom tier LGs from 2015 that didn't have Smart features. That was it.

If you are looking off-brand or at a used TV that is a couple years older maybe there are options, but if not then any decent set will have the smart features. Whether you bother to set them up and use them is another question.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,190
73,497
113
Ankeny
I'm honestly shocked that this question keeps coming up. Can the OP provide a link to what TVs he is looking at that are not smart TVs? At this point, any TV with a decent picture and features will have smart features as well, and this has been the case for a couple years now. So this really should not be a discussion.

I went on Amazon and looked at 55" TVs, 2015 or 2016 models, from Samsung, LG, Vizio, Sharp, and Sony. Out of the 45 options the search returned, there were 2 bottom tier LGs from 2015 that didn't have Smart features. That was it.

If you are looking off-brand or at a used TV that is a couple years older maybe there are options, but if not then any decent set will have the smart features. Whether you bother to set them up and use them is another question.

Exactly this.

Dont think youre getting much of a better deal by getting something without smart features. If you do you're likely just getting a tv with cut down picture quality. Thats probably not a big deal if you're picking up a small 32" tv, but if youre picking up a 50+" tv without smart features its not going to be all that good.