His overall record at Iowa is not bad. The day he stops predominately recruiting white guys, he will be able to have a good record in a usually weak BIG 10.
Glad you stopped by in the in-state forum.
His overall record at Iowa is not bad. The day he stops predominately recruiting white guys, he will be able to have a good record in a usually weak BIG 10.
I feel like someone is going to FIFY. just waitHis overall record at Iowa is not bad. The day he stops predominately recruiting white guys, he will be able to have a good record in a usually weak BIG 10.
I'd be coo with the discrimination stopping though.There is absolutely nothing that needs to change in the UI athletic dept. Status quo is extremely entertaining.
Does he have a winning record against Power 5/conferences the caliber of MVC/Big East/A10?His overall record at Iowa is not bad. The day he stops predominately recruiting white guys, he will be able to have a good record in a usually weak BIG 10.
He's not an awful coach. He does seem to have the ability to get decent players and have them be competitive most years. A few tournament appearances. If your expectations are to make the tournament maybe half the time, and nothing beyond that, then he's your guy.
As a Cyclone fan, that's what I'd like to see over there for the foreseeable future, but I'm guessing that they want more. If they keep him, all the chips are in on next year, but if next year disappoints, it's a larger setback for the program than letting him go this year would be.
Get your level-headed response out of here. This is purely satirical.
If they keep him, all the chips are in on next year, but if next year disappoints, it's a larger setback for the program than letting him go this year would be.
If I were in Iowa's shoes, the biggest reason I would have to fire him this year is that there's no real indication that the team will be better next year. The roster was largely the same last year as it is this year, minus their only scorer, and look how that's going. Yes, they have that Weiskamp kid coming in, but putting all your chips on a Freshman isn't usually a winning strategy.
The serious answer is no. Who could they hire that would do better?
If Cook does transfer, Weiskamp coming in won't matter.If I were in Iowa's shoes, the biggest reason I would have to fire him this year is that there's no real indication that the team will be better next year. The roster was largely the same last year as it is this year, minus their only scorer, and look how that's going. Yes, they have that Weiskamp kid coming in, but putting all your chips on a Freshman isn't usually a winning strategy.
Deal
Think about the candidate pool that job would get. It would be pretty poor.Anyone? That being said he needs at least another decade.
As long as that deal includes keeping this thread up even if the UI Sports Marketing contacts CF I'm in
If I were in Iowa's shoes, the biggest reason I would have to fire him this year is that there's no real indication that the team will be better next year. The roster was largely the same last year as it is this year, minus their only scorer, and look how that's going. Yes, they have that Weiskamp kid coming in, but putting all your chips on a Freshman isn't usually a winning strategy.