Especially when they give porous or non-specific reasons for the prognostication while ignoring the teams on our schedule. Realistically look at the schedule and say, confidently, who are we better than? Ohio is a given and UNI should be (though its always tougher than it should be). I think we may be better than, or at least equal to Cinci, BYU, and KU but those first two are on the road (always tougher games) and KU is hardly a given. KSU, Texas, OU, OSU, Tech, Baylor and Iowa are all better than us on paper, with at least half of those better by a mile. Where are those 9 wins and someone tell me why or how we should expect to win those games?
I think we beat Ohio, UNI, KU and upset 1 team that's better than us. I don't think we win at BYU (tough environment and altitude) but maybe eek one out in Cinci. That's 4-5 wins but wouldn't be shocked if we only beat the first three. Everything goes right? We beat the first 3, Iowa at home, 1 of the Cinci/BYU road games, and upset someone that's better than us at home (TCU or OSU). What is that? Six wins? Anything more is a probably a combination of great coaching by Clanton, Nate (our offense has the most upside of any unit on the team simply because of how it was ran...if changed I think we will be much more competent), the STs not being *******, and some overachievement.
I hope the latter happens. But the brain (resoundingly) says no.