There is an element of truth to this. I’ve believed the P12 was going to be wounded no matter who was in charge, but it was leadership incompetence (both the presidents and GK) that led to its destruction.I know the narrative on this board is that GK was an idiot while BY is a genius, but in reality I think the story is the B12 had realistic and strategically aligned presidents while the Pac had unrealistic arrogance. We were both offered the same deal. The B12 took it and established a look of strength and stability. The Pac rejected it and then floundered until they fractured. The commissioners get far too much credit and blame here. Even BY said in a recent interview that he got lucky, he had no idea the TV money and availability window was about to close.
Part of GK’s job is to get everyone marching in the same direction (willing or unwilling). If some random ass professor and his/her school’s president says “our value is $50M”, but you think that is crazy, then you tell them that. You say, we can’t make that counter-offer in good faith, ESPN will walk away. And you work on the other presidents to overrule the professor.
Everyone at some point in their careers will have a disagreement with a superior. It’s your job to tell them you disagree and here’s why.
I’m sure some Big 12 presidents’ thought our TV deal was too low. But Yormark got them to agree to it because he thought it was fair value and that is what a commissioner is supposed to do. And, yes, the presidents are more in lockstep.
Plus anyone can just tell listening to GK vs BY. BY is more intelligent, well-spoken, and commands a room much better. There’s some truth that he was lucky (after all he had no control over the P12 refusing that deal), but he’s also being modest there too.