You guys are falling for the drive by journalism like bugs to the zapper. The quotes about expecting a turn around next season and CPR being the guy or not are not a continuous quote. In fact the turn around expected next season isn't even a quote, that came from that writer.
For all anyone reading knows the questions were:
How do you feel about the football program?
It's a business, we need to get better and that's hopefully next season. (Quote becomes 'it's a business' journalist adds to article paraphrasing 'and a turnaround is expected next season')
20 questions later
How do you feel about the state of the football program at ISU and what have you told JP about the future of CPR?
I’d like to get our football program where it needs to be, which is representative of a first-class university. We’re not there. The last two seasons were clearly disappointing. As to Paul’s future, I can’t predict that. He knows, (ISU athletics director Jamie Pollard) knows that we want a first-class, winning program and that’s where we’ve got to be and hopefully he’s the guy to get us there, but either way, we’ve got to get there.
By the magic of article writing those two responses have been put in proximity to one another and all of you have inferred that Leath has said CPR needs to win next year or he's gone. In actuality he said absolutely nothing that should be newsworthy. He said football is a business and we under performed the last 2 years. He also said ISU needs to stop under performing and when asked about the coach said he hopes he gets things turned around but if he doesn't we need to do better on the field.
A mountain has been made out of a mole hill in this thread.