People shouldn't look too much into Iowa's week one performance because of how young and inexperienced they are and they are still working on their new passing offense.
...
Yep, this and ST are what the game likely comes down to. ISU cannot have JVB greatly outperform Jantz.If Jantz outplays Vandenberg, Iowa is getting beat.
C'mon man- you're absolutely right on this, but do you REALLY think that they'll get their 'high-powered Texas offense' figured out in 7 days? I mean, they couldn't even score a TD except in garbage time at the end of the game. If we were playing them in November, maybe I'd buy that argument, but not the second game of the season.
I get it - we're not supposed to be dominant, we're ISU...well F that!!! We are getting better, we have amazing coaches and players, and EICC looked like complete crap. ISU 35-17
it's not really garbage time when it's a close game, and the starters for both teams are still playing.
24-21 Iowa
I believe that NIU is better than Tulsa. Of the four teams being mentioned in this thread, NIU was the only one getting votes for the Top 25. Iowa will be better this week at Kinnick. I think ISU is gonna be in for a fight. Its an in-state rivalry, we won last year, and the Hawks are probably a little embarrassed about their performance last weekend, and will be looking to prove something to their fanbase. Plus, their new offensive coordinator obviously is not as conservative as his predecessor. There is no way Ken OKeefe runs in that situation, IMO.
Whoever wins the turnover battle will win this, but I think that will be the good guys. ISU 27 - Iowa 17.
Iowa was in the game last year for two reasons. Our mistakes, and McNutt. We are better than we were last year, they are not as good as they were last year. If we execute our plays on offense, we are winning. Our defense can handle that offense.