Casey Hayward and Micah Hyde are the two examples I can think of that came back to bite them - other than that, not sure. Maybe could have kept Julius Peppers one more year, too.
But I agree - draft and develop is the best philosophy for sustained success.
It also helps to have 25 consecutive seasons of HOF quarterbacking. No other team in the league can boast that. That's got as much to do with Green Bay's overall success as anything. And, don't get me wrong, good for the Packers. That wasn't an accident. But, let's not pretend that their drafting strategy has been light years better than the rest of the league. Between Favre and Rodgers, their quarterbacks have covered up a lot of team blemishes. You only have to look as far back as last year to see what the rest of the team is without the star qb.
Green Bay has managed their cap situation very well over the last 25 or so years. Ron Wolf started it, Ted Thompson continued it, and Brian Gutekunst and Russ Ball have learned from those fellas.
I have no doubt they will create a cap-friendly deal for Rodgers (i.e., front-end loaded, bonus driven, etc) that will keep them able to operate as they have been since Wolf came.
It helps when you don't have a GM leaping blindly into free agency each year....and what's really amazing is that drafting in a disadvantageous position hasn't hindered them from being in playoff (and Super Bowl) contention almost every year.
I understand that lots of fans look down their noses at the Packers, but you really can't argue with the results.
It also helps to have 25 consecutive seasons of HOF quarterbacking. No other team in the league can boast that. That's got as much to do with Green Bay's overall success as anything. And, don't get me wrong, good for the Packers. That wasn't an accident. But, let's not pretend that their drafting strategy has been light years better than the rest of the league. Between Favre and Rodgers, their quarterbacks have covered up a lot of team blemishes. You only have to look as far back as last year to see what the rest of the team is without the star qb.
True.....but part of that drafting strategy was to draft Rodgers. Twenty-four teams had a shot at him, and didn't take him - and I understand that hindsight is always 20/20. But I recall many Packers fans questioning the pick: Why waste a first rounder on a QB when we have a Hall of Famer still playing at a high level?
Too, there was major house-cleaning this year. Capers, Thompson, several assistants relieved of duty. The replacing of Capers was long overdue, and Thompson's successor has shown that he knows there are other ways to build a roster.
And I give the Packers credit for drafting AR. It was a fantastic pick. But aside from that, I don't think their strategy of team building is significantly better than the average.
OK - but I'd argue the results certainly are. (Of course I realized I'm biased - but they have managed to be competitive for an awfully long time without becoming financially strapped.) Even Rodgers' new contract shouldn't handcuff their ability to be competitive.
Are you a Vikings fan, BTW? Just curious.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...ion-pro-football-hall-fame-induction-ceremony
Kind of a **** move by TO. I understand that it's his choice and attendance isn't mandatory for enshrinement, but respect the moment and respect the other inductees and be present. For once, don't make it all about you.
I am a Vikings fan, and realize that makes me a little biased, but look at the times where the defense has been bad, the running game non-existent, the o-line dinged up, and they still are a contender. But Rodgers gets hurt and they're suddenly average, average, average. Their QB play is so much better than the average team, which they should get credit for. But, I don't see exemplary play from many other units on the team.
I can't find anything wrong with your statement, but I love seeing him tweak the NFL, which deserves every bit of bad PR they get.
I can't argue with that. It's a QB-driven league, and we have been extremely fortunate. I think of the 49ers with Montana and Young, and what happened in the years following those two, and it's scary.
What do you think of Cousins? Is he worth that much money? I don't know if Keenum just played out of his mind, but it's tough to think Cousins could do significantly better. Spielman has certainly done a good job of assembling talent up there, at least on the defensive side.
Does it, though? He won't be there. No distraction. They barely have to mention his name. If the sports media chooses to focus on him, that's not TO's fault. They can just ignore him.That's fair. I understand that there isn't a "good guy" when it comes to T.O. vs The Shield. But to me it's disrespectful to the other inductees. It takes away from their moment, and they're no less deserving of the honor than he is. It's a selfish act on his part.
Does it, though? He won't be there. No distraction. They barely have to mention his name. If the sports media chooses to focus on him, that's not TO's fault. They can just ignore him.
You and I both know that's not how sports media works. By not attending he becomes the story, and he knows it. I guarantee you his absence will be the dominant storyline for the HOF weekend.
True, but that's sort of the media's fault, isn't it?
Look at his statement.Not really. Their job is to cover what's newsworthy or what will get the most readership. That would be the story of the guy who will be the first living inductee in the history of the HOF to skip the enshrinement. If he just shows up like everyone else then there's no story. He knows what he's doing. It's an attention seeking move, which considering his past isn't all that surprising. Great player, but me-first attitude all the way.