A full court pass with two defenders in front court (and no ball pressure) and a couple of 6”10 post players is more likely to get a higher percentage look than the 55 footer that was put up by Love. Of course it is going to result in a turnover sometime but that pass if completed a 1/3 of time will result in a 25 foot 3 pointer nearly every time.
A full court pass with two defenders in front court (and no ball pressure) and a couple of 6”10 post players is more likely to get a higher percentage look than the 55 footer that was put up by Love. Of course it is going to result in a turnover sometime but that pass if completed a 1/3 of time will result in a 25 foot 3 pointer nearly every time.
I think a 70-ft pass into a crowd of people is going to get completed WAY less than 1/3 of the time. Not to mention the resulting rushed shot that has to be taken if the offense can actually catch the pass. Alot can go wrong there for the offense. I'll take that anytime over letting a guy dribble to half court and put up an uncontested shot.
Go back and look at the play. ISU had a guy just on the backcourt side of the mid-court line guarding no one. He was in no position to defend against a long pass to the two players AZ had in the frontcourt (who were big guys and well covered by ISU), and in no position to help out or disrupt anything AZ was doing in the backcourt.
Initially ISU actually got Love going towards/down the sideline which is exactly what you want, but the middle was so wide open so he cut back for a clear look at the basket. Certainly a lucky shot, but the defense doesn't need to make it easier, luck or no luck.
Last edited: