Ok, the real parking deal is probably somewhere in the middle. First, I have to say that I can't picture the site Petco is looking at and that would help. Whoever said that you can not only look at the present user is correct, to a point. And no, it has nothing to do with 'assuming a business will fail'. It has to do with building for forever and not for what suits you at that moment. Once you build out a site and do it poorly your hosed until someone decides to scrap it and start over. And yes, the planning horizon for building and zoning issues means that most business will fail, or move, or whatever at some point. SO, 38 is too few for such a large building, but if there is additional space that could be reserved for future additions that would work. Also, shared parking works well. The trend is toward less parking and Ames is not surprisingly probably behind the curve on that one. Parking is a huge waste of space, returns no tax value, is a negative in terms of aesthetics and stormwater issues, etc. Ok, so what was the question?