I somewhat agree we don't have the greatest players. The OL was questionable before it became depleted, and the skill positions don't look so great, either. But I think they would look so much better if they were actually put in the position to win, which they rarely do.
I'm not necessarily convinced the scheme is the problem. So many people are stating that we need to dump the spread in favor of going back to the pro set. The problem is when Chizik came in and dumped the pro set for the spread, everyone cheered him for doing so. Basically, while I myself am not really fond of the spread, it doesn't really matter what the scheme is if you can't effectively call plays and you can't match up talent wise. Do you honestly think Mess would do any better with a pro set than he does with the spread/pistol?
Yes, our offense is underperforming. While some of that is on them for not doing their job, anybody that has watched this team knows the offense looks lost out there. That is on coaching. The offense looked completely unprepared to play today, and this coaching staff had two weeks to prepare them to play this game. And then the play calling for the most part was simply atrocious. It was as if Iowa's DC was in the huddle with us. All evening Iowa was daring us to throw the ball downfield (the secondary was completely open) and instead we run plays straight into the teeth of the defense. And I'm sorry, that bubble screen yards behind the line of scrimmage on 4th and 4 was simple inexcusable. That play never had a chance to succeed. Fine, an OL missed a block. First, I'm not convinced we get the first down even if that block is made, second, it goes to my point that this offense looked completely lost and unprepared to play. Who does that fall on? First Messingham, and Rhoads as the guy who is ultimately responsible for this team.
I honestly don't have the answers on how to fix this offense in two weeks. I do know that one thing that can be done is getting Mess out of there because he is completely in over his head.