I think that its threads like this that remind me of why I love this website.....I mean I really enjoy seeing what everyone elses opinion's are and would be confused if we didn't have differing opinions on (positive and upset) the play of our team. I think that its good for this board to have "dissenting" opinions (as long as they have good arguments to support themselves) for we can not have good discussions if everyone just agreed on everything. It also helps form my own opinions since I do not have complete knowledge of our teams all the time.
Having said that, those of you who think we ought to just congratulate Mac for getting us this far and not hold him accountable for our mediocrity are nuts. I think, however, we should not be talking about firing him mid-season and let the schedule run its course and evaluate our situation at year end.
So how are we going to get to that next level? Well I have been doing a lot of thinking on Mac's overall psychology on winning football. It was no secret when Mac took over 12 years ago that we lacked in several areas including speed and depth. It was his contention that we use our talent at running back (Davis) to shorten the games to help for our lack of depth and also use his talents at the same time. He also stressed limiting mistakes and big plays for the opposition. This strategy helped put us on the map and eventually got us to where we are today, a mediocre Big12 team, whom has aspirations of a bowl game every year.
Now that we have gotten over that hump of lack of speed and depth, I agree with Wesley that he needs to reinvent himself as a coach and implement a more aggressive defense/offense since I believe he now has the talent and depth to pull off this type of system. Jim Boeheim reinvented himself at Syracuse with a new zone defense and it has netted him two trips to the Final Four and a national championship.
I was appalled to see that we only had 9 possessions on Saturday. This, even after we turned the ball over on a couple possessions. How can we expect to score alot of points if we do not put pressure on the opposition and get the ball back for our offense? How many 3 and outs has our D had this year? I presume it could not be many. We can not expect these results to change without more pressure on the qb and changing our 10 yard coverage cushions.
I know this is long....but my overall thoughts are that from the inception of Mac's program here at ISU he has been as conservative as possible on all accounts. Without superior talent at every position you can not win Big 12 Championships without being aggressive in at least some phases of the game. And above everything else, you need to play to your teams strengths. I'm encouraged to see that they made some adjustments in the second half on defense......because an offense thats given only 9 opportunities a game in the Big 12 is going to struggle, no matter the talent, to score 20 points a game especially with the field position we're putting ourselves in. Hopefully the second half was the start of a new cyclone team for the rest of the year.......lets get those huskers on Saturday....GO STATE!!!!!!!
Having said that, those of you who think we ought to just congratulate Mac for getting us this far and not hold him accountable for our mediocrity are nuts. I think, however, we should not be talking about firing him mid-season and let the schedule run its course and evaluate our situation at year end.
So how are we going to get to that next level? Well I have been doing a lot of thinking on Mac's overall psychology on winning football. It was no secret when Mac took over 12 years ago that we lacked in several areas including speed and depth. It was his contention that we use our talent at running back (Davis) to shorten the games to help for our lack of depth and also use his talents at the same time. He also stressed limiting mistakes and big plays for the opposition. This strategy helped put us on the map and eventually got us to where we are today, a mediocre Big12 team, whom has aspirations of a bowl game every year.
Now that we have gotten over that hump of lack of speed and depth, I agree with Wesley that he needs to reinvent himself as a coach and implement a more aggressive defense/offense since I believe he now has the talent and depth to pull off this type of system. Jim Boeheim reinvented himself at Syracuse with a new zone defense and it has netted him two trips to the Final Four and a national championship.
I was appalled to see that we only had 9 possessions on Saturday. This, even after we turned the ball over on a couple possessions. How can we expect to score alot of points if we do not put pressure on the opposition and get the ball back for our offense? How many 3 and outs has our D had this year? I presume it could not be many. We can not expect these results to change without more pressure on the qb and changing our 10 yard coverage cushions.
I know this is long....but my overall thoughts are that from the inception of Mac's program here at ISU he has been as conservative as possible on all accounts. Without superior talent at every position you can not win Big 12 Championships without being aggressive in at least some phases of the game. And above everything else, you need to play to your teams strengths. I'm encouraged to see that they made some adjustments in the second half on defense......because an offense thats given only 9 opportunities a game in the Big 12 is going to struggle, no matter the talent, to score 20 points a game especially with the field position we're putting ourselves in. Hopefully the second half was the start of a new cyclone team for the rest of the year.......lets get those huskers on Saturday....GO STATE!!!!!!!