Jon & Kate update

dosry5

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2006
7,479
6,464
113
Johnston
If you have watched the show for years, she needed the tummy tuck. Those kids did a number on her, and the episode they talked about it, I really felt bad for her.

Kind of interesting that they did whole episodes on her tummy tuck and his hair plugs, but her boob job was kept pretty secret.

That would have been a highly rated show.....I would have helped those ratings.
 

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
If you have watched the show for years, she needed the tummy tuck. Those kids did a number on her, and the episode they talked about it, I really felt bad for her.

Kind of interesting that they did whole episodes on her tummy tuck and his hair plugs, but her boob job was kept pretty secret.

I did catch that one and agree with you. The boob job is a different story however.
 

djcubby

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2006
3,399
173
63
Bondurant
I disagree with you on this one.

The reality is that the vast majority of homes are not like the home of Ozzie and Harriet Nelson or June and Ward Cleaver. Spouses have communication issues and sometimes argue...that is the real world. What is wrong with kids seeing that (assuming there is no physical abuse or drug/alcohol dependencies involved)? And then seeing the parents work through the issue, compromise and stay committed to their relationship.

The reality is that parents typically split for their own selfish reasons...not for the kids. The bottom line, in my opinion, is that it is not good for a kid to miss out on having a full time mother or a full time father.

A marriage is more than just about love...it is about committment...especially when you bring children into the picture.
This. I heard this statement once and it just make sense to me. Your kids live you for 18 or so years, but your wife is for a lifetime. This doesn't mean that you shouldn't take care of your children, but your marriage should come first.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,628
23,885
113
Macomb, MI
Real nice, call the kids losers.

The kids aren't losers - they're in a losing situation.

About the only way the kids could win is if the PA Dept. of Human Services were to intervene and yank the kids away from the exploitress, but that would come with its own set of problems.
 

pulse

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
9,421
2,650
113
A marriage is more than just about love...it is about committment...especially when you bring children into the picture.

I don't think so. Marriage is about love first and foremost. Sure there's commitment, but without love both should move on. It isn't healthy otherwise to have simmering resentment or whatever negative feelings.

Didn't you take woo and screw?
 

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
I don't think so. Marriage is about love first and foremost. Sure there's commitment, but without love both should move on. It isn't healthy otherwise to have simmering resentment or whatever negative feelings.

Didn't you take woo and screw?

You have those things crop up in any relationship. How you handle them is what makes or breaks marriages and friendships.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,922
12,722
113
I'm divorced and we didn't get divorced for "the kids". At the same time, if we were still married today the kids would not be better off. At least I don't think so (will never know).

While divorce is inherently selfish, I didn't get my ears pierced and start chasing 20 year old trim once the judge said it was OK. :)
 

KLoISU02

Member
Jun 2, 2006
166
7
18
SE IA
Maybe I'm being naive, and maybe it doesn't really do a lot of good, but did they seek any kind of counseling? It kind of seems like they just gave up and didn't even try to fix anything. As a 'product' of divorced parents, I know how screwed up separate holidays, Dad's on the weekend can be and I feel so sad for those poor kids. I agree that if it's "World War III" in the household it is really unhealthy, but it doesn't seem like either one of them really tried to fix anything.
 

cyclonenum1

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
7,191
330
83
I don't think so. Marriage is about love first and foremost. Sure there's commitment, but without love both should move on. It isn't healthy otherwise to have simmering resentment or whatever negative feelings.

Didn't you take woo and screw?

I didn't say marriage was only about committment and not about love...it is about both.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,922
12,722
113
Maybe I'm being naive, and maybe it doesn't really do a lot of good, but did they seek any kind of counseling? It kind of seems like they just gave up and didn't even try to fix anything. As a 'product' of divorced parents, I know how screwed up separate holidays, Dad's on the weekend can be and I feel so sad for those poor kids. I agree that if it's "World War III" in the household it is really unhealthy, but it doesn't seem like either one of them really tried to fix anything.

From what I saw it looked like John just gave up. No counseling from what I understand. Not cool. At least put up a fight "for the kids".
 

cyismydog

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
6,340
213
63
You know it's summer on CF when there's a 7 page thread about Jon and Kate plus 8.
 

bos

Legend
Staff member
Apr 10, 2006
30,629
6,415
113
Those crooked houses were pretty cool. Bet they cost a pretty penny though. I did find it fantastic that she manipulated the workers into manipulating Jon on where to put them.
 

Ms3r4ISU

Me: Mea culpa. Also me: Sine cura sis.
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 7, 2008
12,888
8,437
113
Ames
Those crooked houses were pretty cool. Bet they cost a pretty penny though. I did find it fantastic that she manipulated the workers into manipulating Jon on where to put them.

What's new?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron