Actually they make the pizza in house. Not sure on the hours. I know it is not as long as the tap room.
But 9 months a yr Milford is not exactly bustling. I did not realize they also have a pizza truck.
Jamie Pollard on KXNO today
- Thread starter BigJCy
- Start date
But 9 months a yr Milford is not exactly bustling. I did not realize they also have a pizza truck.
Would be nice to have both a tap room and a bar/grill
my dream would be a place like the Iowa Athletic Club in Coralville next to the Xtreme arena
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.
www.instagram.com
He elaborated briefly about the seeding decision. Heavily paraphrasing/summarizing - When committee teams in that vicinity, wasn't a lot of separation across the resumes, but one outlier was ISU's non-con.
In a different season, a situation like that could be road wins, or some other profile factor - maybe for ISU or maybe it's some other team.
One still could argue NCSOS or road record shouldn't be "thing" or a categorical element, it should be built-in to metrics. And probably already is. If committee has to find a way to distinguish and all else is close, that was the only place.
He reiterated (in passing) that he wasn't in the room when the vote was taken (that's a given with selection rules).
In a different season, a situation like that could be road wins, or some other profile factor - maybe for ISU or maybe it's some other team.
One still could argue NCSOS or road record shouldn't be "thing" or a categorical element, it should be built-in to metrics. And probably already is. If committee has to find a way to distinguish and all else is close, that was the only place.
He reiterated (in passing) that he wasn't in the room when the vote was taken (that's a given with selection rules).
Jamie said that all else being equal they used non-con SOS as the ultimate decider, despite it already being incorporated in another metric. Then he said Cyclone fans were not being objective by pointing that out.
So we got dinged twice for a poor non-con SOS.
I just hope we have a more exciting non-con schedule this year. outside of the games we're locked into already. They can't use the "we thought we'd be bad" excuse when they schedule a sub 300 non-con SOS when we are potentially coming back with a top ten team. We'll have a lot of new players of course so I don't expect anything crazy but a game or two against a team with a pulse would be nice.
I think this year's schedule was perfect. Yes, the non-con games sucked, but who cares? It was the right thing for the team's development.
Entertainment from basketball in March >>> November!
we'll have Iowa, Big East (we can't help the selected DePaul last year and knowing we have a top 10 team this year, we should get a good matchup) Maui Invitational (UCONN, UNC, Mich St, Memphis, Dayton, Colorado, Auburn) 3 games right there.
that leaves 6 open non-conf games that will probably be home buy games.
I'm 100% fine with that schedule.
Yup.
Now that we have 20 conference games, we basically eat up that need for extra P5 non-cons.
Not surprised to hear JP double down. The huge hole in his argument (maybe they pointed this out to him yesterday) is that it was not just about Cyclone fans. Almost every talking head out there questioned ISU’s seeding.
im curious how other big 12 powers will schedule OOC with the 20 game big 12 schedule
like KU plays 7 high major non con games every year. will they continue with that model?
'Zona plays 6 but will that change now having a much tougher conference slate?
Imagine comparing two even teams in March and breaking the tie with how tough their opponents were in November rather than how they've been playing in January and February, including playing and beating top ranked teams in conference tournaments.
I'm still surprised everyone is going on about this so much. I know hindsight is 20/20, but it looks like the committee wasn't that wrong. If we really were the top 2 seed, then we had no business losing to Illinois. If we'd have made it to the elite 8, then lost a close one to UConn, I could see an argument. At this point though, we didn't make it to the elite 8 and it wasn't because we ran into a juggernaught team of destiny in the S16.
NCSOS matters for the health of the sport. The sport struggles with regular season relevance enough and if we reward teams for completely punting on the first two months that's going to get even worse.
100% agree. If this team had played a tougher non-con, their record would likely have been worse. And we would have received a worse seed and missed getting placed in Omaha.
No one watches or talks about it until after the Super Bowl. The casuals don’t hop on board until the conference tournaments.
