So you had good TEs and WRs this last season and played one of the easiest schedules of all time but your QB was just that bad that they couldn't produce?
Iowa Football Recruiting
- Thread starter CyTexMex
- Start date
Im sure Iowa TEs and OLs get the benefit of the doubt, but Beyer looked pretty far from an nfl player to me.
Hutchinson was first team all conference and will probably be first team preseason. Jackson isn’t better than him.
Don’t know how a team could pass on 6’5 250lbs running under a 4.6. Very good blocker, started getting utilized later in the season. Chances are he gets drafted.
Beyer will get a shot for sure even if undrafted. I think a team will take a chance though in the draft.
Beyer had it tough on the roster. He came in with two 1st round NFL TE draft picks. When they leave early and he finally gets his shot he is injured, and then Iowa gets another NFL TE in Laporta in front of him as well.
Last edited:
Hawk, Hok, Hack, Squawk, Douche, they are all the same. The urban dictionary definition of a Hawkeye is still the winner.
Urban Dictionary: Hawkeye
The brown ring around a person’s anus that many porn stars bleach for appearance. Many people believe that the name originated from a college football team located in Iowa and is based upon their poor performance, however the name comes from the puckering effect bleach has upon the anus when...
The idea that your case is “Iowa’s players with 100% of the targets produced almost as much as ISU’s players if you completely discount the guy with by far the highest target share” should pretty much tell you all you need to know.
Funny you ask now, and not the first time I did it. You simply said the TE's cut into WR productivity. You know the answer though, that is why you didn't ask when I posted the WR numbers.
How did I discount Hutchinson? I said that outside of him (meaning he was clearly the top WR), that Iowa's numbers were very similar.
I let it slide the first time because it was incredibly stupid. Now that you double downed on it I'm asking why you are using the 40% number
Even if you were using accurate numbers could you imagine what our RBs would do to that schedule you guys got to face? Lol
What are you talking about? ISU faced some horrible rushing defenses. Heck 7 of them were 58th or below in rushing D. Oregon, Kansas, K-State, ULL, Tech and Baylor all sucked badly vs the rush. OSU was okish vs the rush.
Well why don't you update your numbers to be accurate first and then we can address your pathetic schedule
Why does this bother you? I haven't once said Goodson > Hall this year, because he clearly wasn't. Even if both players only played 8 games, Hall outproduced Goodson.
It doesn't bother me. If you want to take away 40% of a players stats because they played 33% more games and try to compare it you're the one showing your intelligence level lol
